Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 6 authors, 2021-10-21

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: enable IOMMU for async vhost

From: Xia, Chenbo <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-24 07:36:02

-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Coquelin <redacted>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 3:14 PM
To: Xia, Chenbo <redacted>; Hu, Jiayu <redacted>; Ding,
Xuan [off-list ref]; dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly
[off-list ref]
Cc: Jiang, Cheng1 <redacted>; Richardson, Bruce
[off-list ref]; Pai G, Sunil [off-list ref]; Wang,
Yinan [off-list ref]; Yang, YvonneX [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: enable IOMMU for async vhost



On 9/24/21 03:53, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Coquelin <redacted>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 10:56 PM
To: Hu, Jiayu <redacted>; Ding, Xuan <redacted>;
dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly [off-list ref]; Xia, Chenbo
[off-list ref]
Cc: Jiang, Cheng1 <redacted>; Richardson, Bruce
[off-list ref]; Pai G, Sunil [off-list ref]; Wang,
Yinan [off-list ref]; Yang, YvonneX [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: enable IOMMU for async vhost



On 9/23/21 16:39, Hu, Jiayu wrote:
quoted
Hi Xuan,
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Ding, Xuan <redacted>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 1:26 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly <redacted>;
maxime.coquelin@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo [off-list ref]
Cc: Hu, Jiayu <redacted>; Jiang, Cheng1
[off-list ref];
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Richardson, Bruce [off-list ref]; Pai G, Sunil
[off-list ref]; Wang, Yinan [off-list ref]; Yang,
YvonneX [off-list ref]; Ding, Xuan [off-list ref]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: enable IOMMU for async vhost

The use of IOMMU has many advantages, such as isolation and address
translation. This patch extends the capbility of DMA engine to use IOMMU
if
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
the DMA engine is bound to vfio.

When set memory table, the guest memory will be mapped into the default
container of DPDK.

Signed-off-by: Xuan Ding <redacted>
---
   lib/vhost/rte_vhost.h  |  1 +
   lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 57
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
   2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/vhost/rte_vhost.h b/lib/vhost/rte_vhost.h index
8d875e9322..e0537249f3 100644
--- a/lib/vhost/rte_vhost.h
+++ b/lib/vhost/rte_vhost.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct rte_vhost_mem_region {
   	void	 *mmap_addr;
   	uint64_t mmap_size;
   	int fd;
+	uint64_t dma_map_success;
How about using bool for dma_map_success?
The bigger problem here is that you are breaking the ABI.
Maybe this kind of driver-facing structs/functions should be removed
from ABI, since we are refactoring DPDK ABI recently.
It has actually been exposed for SPDK, we cannot just remove it from
API.
'exposed' does not mean it has to be ABI. Like 'driver_sdk_headers' in
ethdev lib, those headers can be exposed but do not include ABI. I see
SPDK is using that for building its lib. Not sure in this case, the SPDK
Vhost lib should be considered as application.

Thanks,
Chenbo 
Maxime
quoted
/Chenbo
quoted
quoted
quoted
   };

   /**
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help