<snip>

quoted

quoted

On 2021-08-24 23:30, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:03:03 +0000
Honnappa Nagarahalli [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

One difference between this implementation and the previous one is
this busy loop. rte_pause() relaxes the cpu, but will not make the
calling thread to sleep and wait for the sync event. So here we
can spin a quite long time until the other thread is scheduled by the OS.

Yes, this is a difference. We could add a microsleep to allow for
the OS to

un-schedule the current thread.

quoted

Why not use sched_yield() here?

The man page is not exactly encouraging the use sched_yield on CFS.

Sorry, what is CFS?
There are already several uses of sched_yield in the code.

CFS is the Linux best-effort scheduler and default scheduling policy, and likely
used by most DPDK applications.

Thanks, I read some of the issues. If sched_yield has to be used, the API needs to be implemented for Linux/Windows/FreeBSD. From my perspective, this API is called mostly during init time. I do not think it is worth duplicating the code and maintaining it. I would prefer to go with usleep.