On 8/16/2021 7:12 PM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote:

On 8/2/2021 1:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:

quoted

02/08/2021 03:51, Min Hu (Connor):

quoted

在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:

quoted

在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道:

quoted

26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor):

quoted

在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道:

quoted

10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor):

quoted

This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd.
For example the following commands run two testpmd
processes:

   * the primary process:

./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \
     --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0

   * the secondary process:

./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \
     --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1

Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <redacted>
Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <redacted>
Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <redacted>
---
V16:
* revert unrelated changes.
* add some restrictions in doc.

I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08.

BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed.

Hi, Thomas,
This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by".
And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her,
please check it out, thanks.

Andrew's comment from v15:
"
IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to
consider is a start point to be applied.
"

Hi, Andrew, Thomos,
     What is the least thing should be done for this patch to
meet the state sufficient to be applied?

Hi, all,
	How about this patch, could it be applied?

I was not confident enough to apply it in 21.08.
When others will be back, we'll discuss it again for 21.11.

For 21.11 release.

Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <redacted>

Hi Connor,

Can you please rebase it to latest dpdk (v21.11-rc0) so we can proceed with it?

I am for getting the patch as early as possible in the release cycle, specially
before it is getting busy for -rc1.

Thanks,
ferruh