Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test case
From: Joyce Kong <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-23 02:26:14
<snip>
quoted
quoted
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test case On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:04 PM Joyce Kong [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Function reentrancy test limits maximum number of iterations simultaneously, however it doesn't free the 'fr_test_once' memzones after the fact, so introduce freeing 'fr_test_once' in ring/mempool/hash/fbk/lpm_clean. Meanwhile, add the missing free for test case on main thread. Fixes: 104a92bd026f ("app: add reentrancy tests") Fixes: 995eec619024 ("test: clean up memory for function reentrancy test") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <redacted> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <redacted> Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang <redacted>This patch actually breaks the test (we are lucky, the failure happensoften ;)).quoted
quoted
28/94 DPDK:fast-tests / func_reentrancy_autotest FAIL 0.22s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)--- command ---16:13:45 DPDK_TEST='func_reentrancy_autotest' /home-local/jenkins-local/jenkins-agent/workspace/Generic-Unit-Test- DPDK/dpdk/build/app/test/dpdk-test -l 0-15 --file-prefix=func_reentrancy_autotest--- stdout ---RTE>>func_reentrancy_autotest Func-ReEnt CASE 0: eal init once PASS ring create/lookup: common object allocated 2 times (should be 1) Func- ReEnt CASE 1: ring create/lookup FAIL Test Failed RTE>>--- stderr ---I guess, this is what happens: main lcore worker lcore 1 ... worker lcore X enters ring_create_lookup() enters ring_create_lookup() rte_eal_wait_lcore(worker lcore 1); leaves ring_create_lookup() ring_clean(worker lcore 1); leaves ring_create_lookup() There is no synchronisation point for the main lcore to know the worker lcores are finished invoking the func callback. With this patch, the "common" object is freed by the main lcore *potentially* before some workers start trying to create it. And we end up with multiple workers successfully creating this object, hence the obj_count being incremented. -- David MarchandI think add rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore() like below can ensure the lcores to free objects after all func callback finished. Shall do the change in next version. RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(lcore_id) { if (cores == 1) break; cores--; rte_eal_remote_launch(pt_case->func, pt_case->arg, lcore_id); } rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1); if (pt_case->func(pt_case->arg) < 0) ret = -1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); cores = cores_save; RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(lcore_id) { if (cores == 1) break; cores--; - if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0) - ret = -1; if (pt_case->clean != NULL) pt_case->clean(lcore_id); }Using mp_wait_lcore, the test can't tell if a lcore returned an error after executing the passed callback. An alternative is to split the current loop to first have the per lcore rte_eal_wait_lcore() calls + ret code check, and then a second loop calls the clean() callback. -- David Marchand
Hi, David, thanks for your suggestion, will send a new version with this modification. -- Joyce