[dpdk-dev] 回复: [PATCH v2 1/2] net/i40e: improve performance for scalar Tx
From: Feifei Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-30 05:30:54
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: Xing, Beilei [off-list ref] 发送时间: 2021年6月30日 11:43 收件人: Feifei Wang [off-list ref] 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; nd [off-list ref]; Ruifeng Wang [off-list ref] 主题: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] net/i40e: improve performance for scalar Txquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Feifei Wang <redacted> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 10:04 AM To: Xing, Beilei <redacted> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd@arm.com; Feifei Wang <redacted>; Ruifeng Wang [off-list ref] Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] net/i40e: improve performance for scalar Tx For i40e scalar Tx path, if implement FAST_FREE_MBUF mode, it means per- queue all mbufs come from the same mempool and have refcnt = 1. Thus we can use bulk free of the buffers when mbuf fast free mode is enabled. Following are the test results with this patch: MRR L3FWD Test: two ports & bi-directional flows & one core RX API: i40e_recv_pkts_bulk_alloc TX API: i40e_xmit_pkts_simple ring_descs_size = 1024; Ring_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_SZ = 64; tx_rs_thresh = I40E_DEFAULT_TX_RSBIT_THRESH = 32; tx_free_thresh = I40E_DEFAULT_TX_FREE_THRESH = 32; For scalar path in arm platform with default 'tx_rs_thresh': In n1sdp, performance is improved by 7.9%; In thunderx2, performance is improved by 7.6%. For scalar path in x86 platform with default 'tx_rs_thresh': performance is improved by 4.7%. Suggested-by: Ruifeng Wang <redacted> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <redacted> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <redacted> --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.cb/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index 6c58decece..8c72391cde 100644--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c@@ -1294,7 +1294,11 @@ static __rte_always_inline inti40e_tx_free_bufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq) { struct i40e_tx_entry *txep; - uint16_t i; + int n = txq->tx_rs_thresh;Thanks for the patch, just little comment, can we use 'tx_rs_thresh' to replace 'n' to make it more readable?
Good comments for this, I will update it, thanks.
quoted
+ uint16_t i = 0, j = 0; + struct rte_mbuf *free[RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ]; + const int32_t k = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(n, RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ); + const int32_t m = n % RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ; if ((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) != @@ -1307,9 +1311,23quoted
@@ i40e_tx_free_bufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq) rte_prefetch0((txep + i)->mbuf); if (txq->offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) { - for (i = 0; i < txq->tx_rs_thresh; ++i, ++txep) { - rte_mempool_put(txep->mbuf->pool, txep->mbuf); - txep->mbuf = NULL; + if (k) { + for (j = 0; j != k; j +=RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ)quoted
{ + for (i = 0; i <RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ;quoted
++i, ++txep) { + free[i] = txep->mbuf; + txep->mbuf = NULL; + } + rte_mempool_put_bulk(free[0]->pool, (void **)free, + RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ); + } + } + + if (m) { + for (i = 0; i < m; ++i, ++txep) { + free[i] = txep->mbuf; + txep->mbuf = NULL; + } + rte_mempool_put_bulk(free[0]->pool, (void **)free, m); } } else { for (i = 0; i < txq->tx_rs_thresh; ++i, ++txep) { -- 2.25.1