Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 6/9] app/testpmd: fix parse_fec_mode return type name
From: Jie Zhou <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-29 18:34:43
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 07:29:11AM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 01:55:02PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:quoted
On 6/24/21 1:34 AM, Jie Zhou wrote:quoted
Replace parse_fec_mode misleading return type name mode with fec_capa Fixes: b19da32e3151 ("app/testpmd: add FEC command") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Jie Zhou <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhou <redacted>[snip]quoted
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h index 283b5e3680..9ae4d90dd1 100644 --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ void show_tx_pkt_segments(void); void set_tx_pkt_times(unsigned int *tx_times); void show_tx_pkt_times(void); void set_tx_pkt_split(const char *name); -int parse_fec_mode(const char *name, enum rte_eth_fec_mode *mode); +int parse_fec_mode(const char *name, uint32_t *fec_capa);I guess that the real reason behind is to fix implicit conversion of enum pointer to/from uint32_t pointer. I guess the problem is different signness of enum on Windows compiler.yes, compilers targeting targets will select `int' once all constants of the enumeration list are defined.quoted
If so, please, put real motivation of the changeset in summary. It should be human-readable (and do not contain function name). Explain details in the description. Yes, I agree that mode is misleading here and should be mentioned in the description, but I guess it is not the root cause. May be I'm wrong.
Your understanding on the root cause is corret. Will fix the description in V15. Thanks.