Re: [dpdk-dev] [External] RE: [PATCH v2] vhost: avoid iotlb mempool allocation while IOMMU disabled
From: Xia, Chenbo <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-13 10:58:34
-----Original Message----- From: Wan Junjie <redacted> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 6:52 PM To: Xia, Chenbo <redacted> Cc: David Marchand <redacted>; Maxime Coquelin [off-list ref]; dev@dpdk.org; Peng He [off-list ref]; Zhihong Wang [off-list ref]; Thomas Monjalon [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [External] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: avoid iotlb mempool allocation while IOMMU disabled On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 6:24 PM Xia, Chenbo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: David Marchand <redacted> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 4:39 PM To: Xia, Chenbo <redacted>; Maxime Coquelin [off-list ref] Cc: Wan Junjie <redacted>; dev@dpdk.org; Peng He [off-list ref]; Zhihong Wang [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: avoid iotlb mempool allocationwhilequoted
quoted
IOMMU disabled On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:10 AM Xia, Chenbo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Wan Junjie <redacted> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:15 PM To: Xia, Chenbo <redacted>; Maxime Coquelin [off-list ref] Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wan Junjie <redacted>; Peng He [off-list ref]; Zhihong Wang[off-list ref]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Subject: [PATCH v2] vhost: avoid iotlb mempool allocation while IOMMUdisabledquoted
quoted
If vhost device's IOMMU feature is disabled, iotlb mempool allocation is unnecessary. Reported-by: Peng He <redacted> Signed-off-by: Wan Junjie <redacted> Reviewed-by: Zhihong Wang <redacted> --- 2.11.0Patch applied to next-virtio/main with conflict resolved, ThanksThis patch triggered a regression reported by Red Hat QE. https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703quoted
quoted
Reverting the patch is enough to fix the regression. I'll let you guys decide on the next step for 21.05. -- David MarchandI cannot reproduce this issue on my machine. @Wan Junjie Could you reproduce this? I prefer to revert the patch if things are not very clear as it is only a minor optimization. Thanks, ChenboHi Chenbo, I am not available for this now. Please revert it. Will dig it later. Thanks, Junjie
Luckily I can reproduce now. I will take a look. Chenbo