Thread (174 messages) 174 messages, 4 authors, 2021-05-04

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/25] event/dlb2: add dlb v2.5 probe

From: Jerin Jacob <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-26 11:01:21

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:01 AM McDaniel, Timothy
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerin Jacob <redacted>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:48 AM
To: McDaniel, Timothy <redacted>
Cc: dpdk-dev <redacted>; Jerin Jacob <redacted>; Van Haaren,
Harry [off-list ref]; Ray Kinsella [off-list ref]; Neil
Horman [off-list ref]; Rao, Nikhil [off-list ref];
Carrillo, Erik G [off-list ref]; Gujjar, Abhinandan S
[off-list ref]; Pavan Nikhilesh
[off-list ref]; Hemant Agrawal [off-list ref];
mattias.ronnblom [off-list ref]; Mccarthy, Peter
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/25] event/dlb2: add dlb v2.5 probe

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:49 AM Timothy McDaniel
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This commit adds dlb v2.5 probe support, and updates
parameter parsing.

The dlb v2.5 device differs from dlb v2, in that the
number of resources (ports, queues, ...) is different,
so macros have been added to take the device version
into account.

This commit also cleans up a few issues in the original
dlb2 source:
- eliminate duplicate constant definitions
- removed unused constant definitions

Signed-off-by: Timothy McDaniel <redacted>
---
quoted
-#define EVDEV_DLB2_NAME_PMD dlb2_event
+#define EVDEV_DLB2_NAME_PMD dlb_event
Is this an intended change? why change the driver's name.
Yes, This is an intentional change.  We will be using the same driver name going forward, regardless of the hardware version.
Internally, we know which version of the hardware is present.
Since the driver name is still driver/event/dlb2. Keep it as same
prefix scheme with other drivers.

Thanks,
Tim
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help