Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] SocketPair Broker support for vhost and virtio-user.
From: Maxime Coquelin <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-24 21:53:16
On 3/24/21 10:39 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 3/24/21 9:56 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:quoted
Hi Ilya, On 3/19/21 5:45 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:quoted
On 3/19/21 5:11 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:quoted
On 3/19/21 3:39 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:quoted
Hi Ilya, By the way, it's not clear to me why dpdkvhostuser is deprecated. If OVS is restarted then existing vhost-user connections drop with an error but QEMU could attempt to reconnect to the UNIX domain socket which the new OVS instance will set up. Why is it impossible to reconnect when OVS owns the listen socket?Well, AFAIK, qemu reconnects client connections only: ``reconnect`` sets the timeout for reconnecting on non-server sockets when the remote end goes away. qemu will delay this many seconds and then attempt to reconnect. Zero disables reconnecting, and is the default. I'm not sure about exact reason. It was historically this way. For me it doesn't make much sense. I mean, your right that it's just a socket, so it should not matter who listens and who connects. If reconnection is possible in one direction, it should be possible in the opposite direction too.Sorry, my thought slipped. :) Yes, QEMU supports re-connection for client sockets. So, in theory, dpdkvhostuser ports should work after re-connection. And that would be nice. I don't remember right now why this doesn't work... Maybe vhost-user parts in QEMU doesn't handle this case. Need to dig some more into that and refresh my memory. It was so long ago... Maxime, do you remember?Sorry for the delay. I didn't remember, so I wanted to have a try. I can confirm reconnect works with QEMU as client and with Vhost PMD as server with: <interface type='vhostuser'> <mac address='56:48:4f:53:54:01'/> <source type='unix' path='/tmp/vhost-user1' mode='client'> <reconnect enabled='yes' timeout='1'/> </source> <model type='virtio'/> <driver name='vhost' rx_queue_size='256'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x07' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </interface>Cool, thanks for checking. :) If it works with vhost PMD, it should probably work with OVS too. There is still a couple of problems: 1. OpenStack Nova doesn't support configuration of a 'reconnect' in libvirt xml (it only adds the 'source'): https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/config.py#L1834 2. 'reconnect' configuration supported only starting from libvirt 4.1.0. It's released in 2018, but still some systems are using older versions. e.g. Ubuntu 18.04 which will be supported until 2023 uses libvirt 4.0.0.
Is it really a problem? We can keep using OVS as client for OSP, and use OVS as server for containers.
quoted
quoted
quoted
dpdkvhostuser was deprecated just to scare users and force them to migrate to dpdkvhostuserclient and avoid constant bug reports like: "OVS service restarted and network is lost now". BTW, virtio-user ports in DPDK doesn't support re-connection in client mode too.This is still true, though. virtio-user in client mode doesn't reconnect.That could be added, and it is maybe not as important for containers as it is for VM to support it, given the ephemeral nature of containers?Well, restart of OVS should not require restarting of all the containers on the host even though they are "stateless". BTW, some infrastructure changes that I made in this series might be reused to implement client-side reconnection for virtio-user.
Great, I'll look at the series when we'll work on adding reconnect for clients. Thanks, Maxime
quoted
Regards, Maximequoted
quoted
BTW2, with SocketPair Broker it might be cheaper to implement server reconnection in QEMU because all connections in these case are client connections, i.e. both ends will connect() to a broker. Bets regards, Ilya Maximets.