Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] net/ionic: fixes and optimizations
From: Ferruh Yigit <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 22:23:37
On 1/27/2021 6:10 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
quoted
On Jan 27, 2021, at 1:02 PM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>> wrote: On 1/18/2021 8:34 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:quoted
This patch series fixes some transmit issues, adds (better) support for big-endian systems, and improves performance by stripping down some structures and inlining a few functions. The endianness code has been reviewed internally but not really tested - I do not have access to a big-endian system to test on. Signed-off-by: Andrew Boyer <aboyer@pensando.io <mailto:aboyer@pensando.io>> Andrew Boyer (13): net/ionic: strip out unneeded interrupt code net/ionic: observe endianness in firmware commands net/ionic: observe endianness in Rx filter code net/ionic: add an array-size macro net/ionic: query firmware for supported queue versions net/ionic: clean up Tx queue version support net/ionic: inline queue flush function net/ionic: inline queue space function net/ionic: observe endiannness in ioread/iowrite net/ionic: fix to allow separate L3 and L4 csum offload net/ionic: convert per-queue offloads into queue flags net/ionic: fix up function attribute tags net/ionic: fix address handling in transmit codeI can remove the 4/13 & 6/13 without conflict, and seems there is no dependency to them and new version of them can be sent separately, if you confirm I can proceed with rest of the set now.Yes please. Do 4 & 6 become v1 patches that stand alone? Or v2 patches that reply to their v1 versions?
Except 4/13 & 6/13, Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks. Can you please send missing two patches as v2 as reply to v1? Thanks, ferruh