Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: nvme on Windows requires class id and bus
From: Tal Shnaiderman <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 15:13:45
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus/pci: nvme on Windows requires class id and bus External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Hi Tal, Thanks for the comments.quoted
quoted
+ /* Try and find PCI class ID */ + for (cp = buf; !(cp[0] == 0 && cp[1] == 0); cp++)How about for (cp = buf; cp[0] || cp[1]; cp++)That would be my preferred idiom, but the DPDK coding style (1.9.1) says 'do not use ! for tests unless it is a boolean' (but somewhat confusingly does so in a section on NULL pointers). I interpreted it as a general prohibition on conditionals without an explicit operator (except for booleans). I'd love to be corrected here!quoted
quoted
+ if (*cp == '&' && sscanf_s(cp, "&CC_%" PRIx32, + &class_id) == 1)Could there be a case where PCI\\VEN_v(4)&DEV_d(4)&CC_c(2)s(2) existbut PCI\\VEN_v(4)&DEV_d(4)&CC_c(2)s(2)p(2) doesn't? In that case the parsing would be incorrect. The MSDN documentation says that the most specific string will be returned first, in this case &CC_c(2)s(2)p(2), so if there is a 6-digit class ID we will return it. That left me wondering what to do if we only encounter a 4-digit class ID. If we ignore it, then we won't be able to match on the class ID. We could parse it as 4-digits and supply zero for the p(2) field, but that left me wondering why Windows wouldn't have already done that for us. What I see on my own systems is that there is always a 6-digit class ID defined, even if the pci-ids repository doesn't list any values for p(2) (e.g. https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/read/PD/07/80 reports as &CC_078000). My conclusion was that was probably best just to return the first class ID that Windows reports even if it's only 4-digits. That way the device can still be found and will match the CC_ info displayed in device manager.
I'd shift the class_id value to the right in case the returned value is 4 digit, just to verify the result would be "c(2)s(2) 0" and not "0 s(2)p(2)", however when testing your change I couldn't find a case where only 4 digits matched. Either than that LGTM.
Thanks, Nick