Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2021-03-16

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: nvme on Windows requires class id and bus

From: Tal Shnaiderman <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 15:13:45

Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus/pci: nvme on Windows requires class id and bus

External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


Hi Tal,

Thanks for the comments.
quoted
quoted
+       /* Try and find PCI class ID */
+       for (cp = buf; !(cp[0] == 0 && cp[1] == 0); cp++)
How about
for (cp = buf; cp[0] || cp[1]; cp++)
That would be my preferred idiom, but the DPDK coding style (1.9.1) says 'do
not use ! for tests unless it is a boolean' (but somewhat confusingly does so
in a section on NULL pointers).  I interpreted it as a general prohibition on
conditionals without an explicit operator (except for booleans).  I'd love to be
corrected here!
quoted
quoted
+               if (*cp == '&' && sscanf_s(cp, "&CC_%" PRIx32,
+ &class_id) == 1)
Could there be a case where PCI\\VEN_v(4)&DEV_d(4)&CC_c(2)s(2) exist
but PCI\\VEN_v(4)&DEV_d(4)&CC_c(2)s(2)p(2) doesn't? In that case the
parsing would be incorrect.
The MSDN documentation says that the most specific string will be returned
first, in this case &CC_c(2)s(2)p(2), so if there is a 6-digit class ID we will
return it.  That left me wondering what to do if we only encounter a 4-digit
class ID.  If we ignore it, then we won't be able to match on the class ID.  We
could parse it as 4-digits and supply zero for the p(2) field, but that left me
wondering why Windows wouldn't have already done that for us.  What I see
on my own systems is that there is always a 6-digit class ID defined, even if
the pci-ids repository doesn't list any values for p(2) (e.g.
https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/read/PD/07/80 reports as &CC_078000).

My conclusion was that was probably best just to return the first class ID that
Windows reports even if it's only 4-digits.  That way the device can still be
found and will match the CC_ info displayed in device manager.
I'd shift the class_id value to the right in case the returned value is 4 digit, just to verify the result would be "c(2)s(2) 0" and not "0 s(2)p(2)", however when testing your change I couldn't find a case where only 4 digits matched.

Either than that LGTM.
Thanks,
Nick
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help