Thread (62 messages) 62 messages, 6 authors, 2020-11-05

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/i40e: fix max mtu size packets with vlan tag cannot be received by default

From: Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-22 10:47:18

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: Yang, SteveX <redacted>
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 2:24 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Zhao1, Wei <redacted>; Guo, Jia <redacted>; Yang, Qiming <redacted>; Zhang, Qi Z
[off-list ref]; Wu, Jingjing [off-list ref]; Xing, Beilei [off-list ref]; Ananyev, Konstantin
[off-list ref]; Yang, SteveX [off-list ref]
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] net/i40e: fix max mtu size packets with vlan tag cannot be received by default

testpmd will initialize default max packet length to 1518 which doesn't
include vlan tag size in ether overheader. Once, send the max mtu length
packet with vlan tag, the max packet length will exceed 1518 that will
cause packets dropped directly from NIC hw side. But for i40e/i40evf,
they should support dual vlan tags that need more 8 bytes for max packet
size, so, configure the correct max packet size in dev_config ops.

Fixes: ff8282f4bbcd ("net/i40e: consider QinQ when setting MTU")

Signed-off-by: SteveX Yang <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c    |  5 +++++
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
index 563f21d9d..023c86d66 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
@@ -1930,6 +1930,11 @@ i40e_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 	ad->tx_simple_allowed = true;
 	ad->tx_vec_allowed = true;

+	/* Considering QinQ packet, max frame size should be MTU and
+	 * corresponding ether overhead.
+	 */
+	i40e_dev_mtu_set(dev, dev->data->mtu);
+
 	if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode & ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG)
 		dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH;
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
index 8531cf6b1..b268b3d00 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
@@ -1669,6 +1669,7 @@ i40evf_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 		I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev->data->dev_private);
 	uint16_t num_queue_pairs = RTE_MAX(dev->data->nb_rx_queues,
 				dev->data->nb_tx_queues);
+	struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;

 	/* Initialize to TRUE. If any of Rx queues doesn't meet the bulk
 	 * allocation or vector Rx preconditions we will reset it.
@@ -1681,6 +1682,16 @@ i40evf_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 	dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.lsc =
 		!!(dev->data->dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_INTR_LSC);

+
+	/* Considering QinQ packet, max frame size should be MTU and
+	 * corresponding ether overhead.
+	 */
+	if (dev->data->mtu == RTE_ETHER_MTU &&
+		rxmode->max_rx_pkt_len == RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN) {
+		rxmode->max_rx_pkt_len = RTE_ETHER_MTU + I40E_ETH_OVERHEAD;
+		rxmode->offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
+	}
Wonder why vf code-path is different here?
Can't we also do mtu_set() here?
+
 	if (num_queue_pairs > vf->vsi_res->num_queue_pairs) {
 		struct i40e_hw *hw;
 		int ret;
--
2.17.1
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help