Re: [dpdk-dev] pci device access from dpdk secondary process with igb_uio
From: vijay mohan <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-25 19:46:03
Hi Fiona, Thanks for verifying the fix. I will send this patch out for review. Thanks, Vijay On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 07:09, Trahe, Fiona [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Vijay, Thanks for debugging. We've recreated your issue and validated that this fixes it. Do you want to go ahead and send up a patch or will I do that? Fionaquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Trahe, Fiona Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 5:19 PM To: vijay mohan <redacted>; dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <redacted> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <redacted> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] pci device access from dpdk secondary process with igb_uio Hi Vijay, Sorry for the delay, we missed this as It arrived while on Christmas holidays. We'll investigate, though it may take some time as this looks like a pci lib issue and up to recently we have only been using QAT in primary processes so don't have expertise yet in this area. If you could provide some background to your use-case for qat in primary/secondary, that may help. Fionaquoted
-----Original Message----- From: dev <redacted> On Behalf Of vijay mohan Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 6:58 PM To: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <redacted>; Griffin, John <redacted> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] pci device access from dpdk secondary process with igb_uio On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 at 16:58, vijay mohan [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi All, I am trying to use pci vf device with secondary process in a multiple process mode and findingpci_dev->mem_resource[0].addr to be NULL. This happens when the pci device is attached to igb_uio.ko but with vfio_pci it works fine.quoted
Looking at the pci device initialization part for secondary process, when device is presentedthroughquoted
igb_uio, (in pci_uio_map_secondary), it doesn't seems to update pci_dev->mem_resource[X].addr. For vfio-pci, it updates the addresses in pci_vfio_map_resource_secondary. With the followingpatch, iquoted
am able to use the device from secondary process but would like to know if I am missing something.quoted
diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common_uio.c b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common_uio.c index 7ea73db..f4dca9d 100644 --- a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common_uio.c +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common_uio.c@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ } return -1; } + dev->mem_resource[i].addr = mapaddr; } return 0; }Hi Ferruh Yigit/John Griffin, I am trying to use QAT crypto VF device attached to igb_uio.ko with secondary process and has observed following errors while setting up the queues due to pci_dev->mem_resource[0].addr check from qat_qp_setup. mem_resource[0].addr happens to be NULL when the device is presented to dpdk through igb_uio but works fine with vfio_pci.ko. Could you please let me know if the fix mentioned above is sufficient for the device to work with secondary process. CRYPTODEV: Initialisation parameters - name: BDF_qat_sym,socket id: 0, max queue pairs: 0 qat_sym_dev_create(): Created QAT SYM device BDF_qat_sym as cryptodev instance 0 qat_comp_dev_create(): Creating QAT COMP device BDF_qat_comp qat_comp_dev_create(): Created QAT COMP device BDF_qat_comp as compressdev instance 0 Dev config Setting up queues qat_qp_setup(): Setup qp 0 on qat pci device 0 gen 2 qat_qp_setup(): Could not find VF config space (UIO driver attached?). Crypto device queue pair init failed Thanks, Vijay