Thread (74 messages) 74 messages, 6 authors, 2020-01-17

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] net/ixgbe: cleanup Tx buffers

From: Ferruh Yigit <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-16 14:47:20

On 1/13/2020 9:57 AM, Chenxu Di wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add support to the ixgbe driver for the API rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup
to force free consumed buffers on Tx ring.

Signed-off-by: Chenxu Di <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c |   2 +
 drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c   | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h   |   2 +-
 3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
index 2c6fd0f13..75bdd391a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
@@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbe_eth_dev_ops = {
 	.udp_tunnel_port_add  = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_add,
 	.udp_tunnel_port_del  = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_del,
 	.tm_ops_get           = ixgbe_tm_ops_get,
+	.tx_done_cleanup      = ixgbe_dev_tx_done_cleanup,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -649,6 +650,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbevf_eth_dev_ops = {
 	.reta_query           = ixgbe_dev_rss_reta_query,
 	.rss_hash_update      = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_update,
 	.rss_hash_conf_get    = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_conf_get,
+	.tx_done_cleanup      = ixgbe_dev_tx_done_cleanup,
 };
 
 /* store statistics names and its offset in stats structure */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
index fa572d184..a2e85ed5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
@@ -2306,6 +2306,115 @@ ixgbe_tx_queue_release_mbufs(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
 	}
 }
 
+static int
+ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_full(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t free_cnt)
+{
+	struct ixgbe_tx_entry *swr_ring = txq->sw_ring;
+	uint16_t i, tx_last, tx_id;
+	uint16_t nb_tx_free_last;
+	uint16_t nb_tx_to_clean;
+	uint32_t pkt_cnt;
+
+	/* Start free mbuf from the next of tx_tail */
+	tx_last = txq->tx_tail;
+	tx_id  = swr_ring[tx_last].next_id;
+
+	if (txq->nb_tx_free == 0 && ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
+		return 0;
+
+	nb_tx_to_clean = txq->nb_tx_free;
+	nb_tx_free_last = txq->nb_tx_free;
+	if (!free_cnt)
+		free_cnt = txq->nb_tx_desc;
+
+	/* Loop through swr_ring to count the amount of
+	 * freeable mubfs and packets.
+	 */
+	for (pkt_cnt = 0; pkt_cnt < free_cnt; ) {
+		for (i = 0; i < nb_tx_to_clean &&
+			pkt_cnt < free_cnt &&
+			tx_id != tx_last; i++) {
+			if (swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf != NULL) {
+				rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf);
+				swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf = NULL;
+
+				/*
+				 * last segment in the packet,
+				 * increment packet count
+				 */
+				pkt_cnt += (swr_ring[tx_id].last_id == tx_id);
+			}
+
+			tx_id = swr_ring[tx_id].next_id;
+		}
+
+		if (txq->tx_rs_thresh > txq->nb_tx_desc -
+			txq->nb_tx_free || tx_id == tx_last)
+			break;
+
+		if (pkt_cnt < free_cnt) {
+			if (ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
+				break;
+
+			nb_tx_to_clean = txq->nb_tx_free - nb_tx_free_last;
+			nb_tx_free_last = txq->nb_tx_free;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return (int)pkt_cnt;
+}
+
+static int
+ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq,
+			uint32_t free_cnt)
+{
+	int i, n, cnt;
+
+	if (free_cnt == 0 || free_cnt > txq->nb_tx_desc)
+		free_cnt = txq->nb_tx_desc;
+
+	cnt = free_cnt - free_cnt % txq->tx_rs_thresh;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i += n) {
+		if (txq->nb_tx_desc - txq->nb_tx_free < txq->tx_rs_thresh)
+			break;
+
+		n = ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(txq);
+
+		if (n == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return i;
+}
+
+static int
+ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq __rte_unused,
+			uint32_t free_cnt __rte_unused)
+{
+	return -ENOTSUP;
+}
+
+int
+ixgbe_dev_tx_done_cleanup(void *tx_queue, uint32_t free_cnt)
+{
+	struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq = (struct ixgbe_tx_queue *)tx_queue;
+	if (txq->offloads == 0 &&
+#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY
+			!(txq->using_ipsec) &&
+#endif
+			txq->tx_rs_thresh >= RTE_PMD_IXGBE_TX_MAX_BURST)
+#ifdef RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR
+		if (txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_IXGBE_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ &&
+				(rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ||
+					txq->sw_ring_v != NULL))
+			return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec(txq, free_cnt);
+#endif
+		return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(txq, free_cnt);
+
+	return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_full(txq, free_cnt);
+}
+
Missing curly parantheses in the 'if' blocks are causing confusion on which
return patch to take.

the above code is like this:
if (txq->offloads == 0 && ...)
  if (txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_IXGBE_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ && ...)
    return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec(txq, free_cnt);
  return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(txq, free_cnt); <----- [*]
return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_full(txq, free_cnt);

It is not clear, and looks like wrong based on indentation, when to get the [*]
path above.

I will add curly parantheses while merging.

Btw, why we need "#ifdef RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR" here, can't we remove it?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help