Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process | dpdk-dev | Ratatoskr

[PATCH 0/4] support secondary process for failsafe · Raslan Darawsheh <hidden> · 2019-02-28
[PATCH 1/4] net/failsafe: replace local device with shared data · Raslan Darawsheh <hidden> · 2019-02-28
Re: [PATCH 1/4] net/failsafe: replace local device with shared data · Thomas Monjalon <hidden> · 2019-02-28
[PATCH 2/4] net/failsafe: change back-reference from sub-device · Raslan Darawsheh <hidden> · 2019-02-28
Re: [PATCH 2/4] net/failsafe: change back-reference from sub-device · Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> · 2019-02-28
[PATCH 3/4] net/failsafe: replace local sub-device with shared data · Raslan Darawsheh <hidden> · 2019-02-28
Re: [PATCH 3/4] net/failsafe: replace local sub-device with shared data · Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> · 2019-02-28
[PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process · Raslan Darawsheh <hidden> · 2019-02-28
Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process · Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> · 2019-02-28
Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process · Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> · 2019-02-28
Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process · Raslan Darawsheh <hidden> · 2019-03-05
Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process · Thomas Monjalon <hidden> · 2019-03-05

Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process

From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: 2019-02-28 17:23:19

On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:49:28 +0000
Raslan Darawsheh [off-list ref] wrote:

 
 static int
+devargs_already_listed(struct rte_devargs *devargs)

Why not make this function bool?

static bool
devargs_already_listed(...)