Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2018-06-04

Re: [dpdk-stable] Regression tests for stable releases from companies involved in DPDK

From: Luca Boccassi <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-04 08:38:37

On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 05:24 +0000, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
Hello Luca
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 3:57 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Regression tests for stable releases from
companies
involved in DPDK

Hello all,

At this morning's release meeting (minutes coming soon from John),
we
briefly discussed the state of the regression testing for stable
releases and agreed we need to formalise the process.

At the moment we have a firm commitment from Intel and Mellanox to
test
all stable branches (and if I heard correctly from NXP as well?
Please
Yes, I confirmed that on call on behalf of NXP. But...
quoted
confirm!). AT&T committed to run regressions on the 16.11 branch.
Not until 17.05 did NXP's first driver started appearing in the DPDK
upstream releases. Somehow, I misunderstood your request for 16.11
with 17.11 stable.
That's fine - the 17.11 branch is also getting ready for release (see
relevant threads), and 18.02 will soon as well.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help