Re: [RFC v2] doc compression API for DPDK
From: Verma, Shally <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-15 05:53:32
-----Original Message----- From: Ahmed Mansour [mailto:ahmed.mansour@nxp.com] Sent: 14 February 2018 22:25 To: Verma, Shally <redacted>; Trahe, Fiona <redacted>; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Athreya, Narayana Prasad <redacted>; Gupta, Ashish <redacted>; Sahu, Sunila [off-list ref]; De Lara Guarch, Pablo [off-list ref]; Challa, Mahipal [off-list ref]; Jain, Deepak K [off-list ref]; Hemant Agrawal [off-list ref]; Roy Pledge [off-list ref]; Youri Querry [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [RFC v2] doc compression API for DPDK On 2/14/2018 12:41 AM, Verma, Shally wrote:quoted
Hi Ahmedquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Ahmed Mansour [mailto:ahmed.mansour@nxp.com] Sent: 02 February 2018 02:20 To: Trahe, Fiona <redacted>; Verma, Shally <redacted>; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Athreya, Narayana Prasad <redacted>; Gupta, Ashish <redacted>; Sahu, Sunila [off-list ref]; De Lara Guarch, Pablo [off-list ref]; Challa, Mahipal [off-list ref]; Jain, Deepak K [off-list ref]; Hemant Agrawal [off-list ref]; Roy Pledge [off-list ref]; Youri Querry [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [RFC v2] doc compression API for DPDKquoted
quoted
quoted
[Fiona] I propose if BFINAL bit is detected before end of input the decompression should stop. In this case consumed will be < src.length. produced will be < dst buffer size. Do we need an extra STATUS response? STATUS_BFINAL_DETECTED ?[Shally] @fiona, I assume you mean here decompressor stop after processing Final block right?[Fiona] Yes. And if yes,quoted
and if it can process that final block successfully/unsuccessfully, then status could simply be SUCCESS/FAILED. I don't see need of specific return code for this use case. Just to share, in past, we have practically run into such cases with boost lib, and decompressor has simply worked this way.[Fiona] I'm ok with this.quoted
quoted
Only thing I don't like this is it can impact on performance, as normally we can just look for STATUS == SUCCESS. Anything else should be an exception. Now the application would have to check for SUCCESS || BFINAL_DETECTED every time. Do you have a suggestion on how we should handle this?[Ahmed] This makes sense. So in all cases the PMD should assume that it should stop as soon as a BFINAL is observed. A question. What happens ins stateful vs stateless modes when decompressing an op that encompasses multiple BFINALs. I assume the caller in that case will use the consumed=x bytes to find out how far in to the input is the end of the first stream and start from the next byte. Is this correct?[Shally] As per my understanding, each op can be tied up to only one stream as we have only one stream pointer per op and onestream can have only one BFINAL (as stream is one complete compressed data) but looks like you're suggesting a case where one op can carry multiple independent streams? and thus multiple BFINAL?! , such as, below here is op pointing to more than one streamsquoted
-------------------------------------------- op --> |stream1|stream2| |stream3| -------------------------------------------- Could you confirm if I understand your question correct?[Ahmed] Correct. We found that in some storage applications the user does not know where exactly the BFINAL is. They rely on zlib software today. zlib.net software halts at the first BFINAL. Users put multiple streams in one op and rely on zlib to stop and inform them of the end location of the first stream.
[Shally] Then this is practically case possible on decompressor and decompressor doesn't regard flush flag. So in that case, I expect PMD to internally reset themselves (say in case of zlib going through cycle of deflateEnd and deflateInit or deflateReset) and return with status = SUCCESS with updated produced and consumed. Now in such case, if previous stream also has some footer followed by start of next stream, then I am not sure how PMD / lib can support that case. Have you had practically run of such use-case on zlib? If yes, how then such application handle it in your experience? I can imagine for such input zlib would return with Z_FLUSH_END after 1st BFINAL is processed to the user. Then application doing deflateReset() or Init-End() cycle before starting with next. But if it starts with input that doesn't have valid zlib header, then likely it will throw an error.
quoted
Thanks Shally