Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 3 authors, 2018-01-14

Re: [RFC v2 1/5] ether: add flow action to redirect packet in a switch domain

From: Alex Rosenbaum <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-22 22:10:10

+Adrien

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Zhang, Qi Z [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Qi Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add action RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SWITCH_PORT, it can be used to
redirect
quoted
A verbs would be better suited for an ACTION_TYPE. while ".._TYPE_PORT" is
a nous.
Probably ".._TYPE_REDIRECT" would better fit here.
I agree it will be better to use verbs for action, so we can have TYPE_REDIRECT_TO_PORT/VF/PF...,
But since we already have ACTION_TYPE_VF, ACTION_TYPE_PF ...
Maybe it's better just to follow the same pattern?
hemmm, missed these ACTION_TYPE_VF/PF...
Adrien, what do you think about these naming conventions?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help