Re: [PATCH] net/virtio: fix an incorrect behavior of device stop/start
From: Yuanhan Liu <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-19 13:53:14
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:14:26PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:26:01PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:quoted
After starting a device, the driver shouldn't deliver the packets that already existed in the device before it is started to the applications.
Otherwise? I'm assuming you fixed a real issue? If so, it'd be better if you can add a bit info about the issue.
This patch fixes this issuequoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
by flushing the Rx queues when starting the device. Fixes: a85786dc816f ("virtio: fix states handling during initialization")
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
@@ -1737,6 +1737,12 @@ virtio_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)} } + /* Flush the packets in Rx queues. */ + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) { + rxvq = dev->data->rx_queues[i]; + virtqueue_flush(rxvq->vq); + } +A little bit further down is a for loop going over rx queues calling notify. Could we flush directly before the notify and save the additional loop?I saw there is also another `for' loop to dump the Rx queues. And I think it makes the code more readable to flush the Rx queues in a separate `for' loop too. Besides, this function isn't performance critical. So I didn't combine them into one `for' loop.To me code is better readable when it is concise, so I'd still vote for combining the loops if its logically equivalent. On the other hand I think this should be fixed soon, so Reviewed-by: Jens Freimann <redacted>Thank you! :-) It's not a big deal. I'd like to leave it up to the maintainers. They can make the decision when applying the patch.
I agree with Jens here. We already have too many for loops in this function. Let's not add yet another one. Besides that, the VIRTQUEU_DUMP loop probably should also be removed and more it to the notify loop. --yliu