Thread (157 messages) 157 messages, 7 authors, 2017-10-08

Re: [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support

From: Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-30 09:39:12

Hi Mark,
quoted
quoted
quoted
+
+void
+gso_parse_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
There is a function rte_net_get_ptype() that supposed to provide similar
functionality.
quoted
So we probably don't need to create a new SW parse function here, instead
would be better
quoted
to reuse (and update if needed) an existing one.
Again user already might have l2/l3/l4.../_len and packet_type setuped.
So better to keep SW packet parsing out of scope of that library.
Hmm, I know we have discussed this design choice in the GRO library, and I
also think it's
better to reuse these values.

But from the perspective of OVS, it may add extra overhead, since OVS doesn't
parse every
packet originally. Maybe @Mark can give us more inputs from the view of OVS.
Hi Jiayu, Konstantin

For GSO, the application needs to know:
- the packet type (as it only currently supports TCP/IPv4, VxLAN, GRE packets)
- the l2/3/4_lens, etc. (in order to replicate the original packet's headers across outgoing segments)

For this, we can use the rte_net_get_ptype function, as per Konstantin's suggestion, as it provides both - thanks Konstantin!

WRT the extra overhead in OvS: TSO is the defacto standard, and GSO is provided purely as a fallback option. As such, and since the
additional packet parsing is a necessity in order to facilitate GSO, the additional overhead is IMO acceptable.
As I remember, for TSO in DPDK user still have to provide l2/l3/l4_len and mss information to the PMD.
So unless user knows these value straightway (user creates a packet himself) some packet processing will be unavailable anyway.
Konstantin
Thanks,
Mark
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help