Re: [PATCH] doc: add eventdev library to programmers guide
From: Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-31 12:43:17
From: Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-31 12:43:17
2017-03-30 19:06, Jerin Jacob:
2) ethdev integration is pending.
What is pending exactly? [...]
Based on the above status, I would like to merge eventdev to DPDK v17.05 with EXPERIMENTAL tag and address pending work in v17.08 and remove the EXPERIMENTAL tag. Thomas and all, Thoughts ? NOTE: Keeping the EXPERIMENTAL status to allow minor change in the API without ABI issue when we address the pending work and I guess NXP eventdev also lined up for v17.08 and they may need a minor change in the API
Yes, generally speaking, it is a good idea to put the experimental tag for the first release of an API.