On 2/7/2017 3:45 PM, Wu, Jingjing wrote:

quoted

quoted

+#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588
+#define I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST #else #define
+I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST 0 #endif
+
 #define I40E_TX_CKSUM_OFFLOAD_MASK (		 \
 		PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM |		 \
 		PKT_TX_L4_MASK |		 \

@@ -87,7 +93,9 @@
 		PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM | \
 		PKT_TX_TCP_SEG |        \
 		PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT |       \
-		PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT)
+		PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT |	\
+		PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK |	\
+		I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST)

PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST added into I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK, but not into
PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK (patch 4/4)

Shouldn't PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK be a super set of driver ones. Otherwise
PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST will be marked as not supported according below
XOR logic.

Yes, you are right. Should I send a new version patch set? Or just update the [4/4]?

Please send a new version of the set.

Thanks,
ferruh