Re: [PATCH 1/6] net/tap: use correct tap name
From: Ferruh Yigit <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-01 17:50:19
On 2/1/2017 3:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
quoted
On Feb 1, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Pascal Mazon [off-list ref] wrote: On 02/01/2017 04:25 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:quoted
quoted
On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:11 AM, Pascal Mazon [off-list ref] wrote: On 02/01/2017 12:29 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:quoted
quoted
On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Pascal Mazon [off-list ref] wrote: On 01/31/2017 05:06 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:>quoted
Looking at the changes to set the link up/down and the adding the two functions. I noticed in the stop/start routines I was set the link in DPDK and not adjusting the interface link. Should the stop/start routine also do the same thing?Well, my patch is probably wrong. The best option would probably be to set dev->data->dev_link.link_status appropriately inside tap_link_set() only. I'm not sure it's compulsory to actually set the link UP in tap_dev_start() (respectively DOWN in tap_dev_stop()). If it is, however, it would be best done using tap_link_set() in those functions.I was setting the link up/down in both places in the old code. The gotta is link up/down came later (I guess) and applications only call start/stop. In the other drivers like ring the like they tend to set link in start/stop and in link up/down, which is what I patterned my driver on. I looked around and the only applications calling link up/down was testpmd and ip_pipeline, but all of the apps call start/stop. Even the docs to not suggest that link up/down be used it appears start/stop must set the Link state and the developer can call link up/down APIs if needed for others reasons. I assume the link up/down only effects the link state and the start/stop is creating/destroying resources. My only solution I guess is to add the link up/down code to the start/stop API.I'm not sure I understand your conclusion. If the apps usually call start/stop only, then definitely those functions should set the link state appropriately. To that effect, I think it best to just call tap_link_set() in tap_dev_start() (and similar for stopping). Apps with just start/stop functions would get the expected behavior, and the tap PMD would also support setting the link up/down independently, for testpmd and ip_pipeline for example. Does that sound fine?Yes, this was what I was trying to say and calling tap_link_set() in tap_dev_start() is the solution.Great, that looks good to me!Ferruh, Please apply Pascal’s 6 patches and I will based my changes on top of those changes. Does that sound reasonable?
That is good, I will. Pascal, Only patch 1/6 commit log needs reworking, rest looks good, (although I still will do one more round of basic tests). For commit log update, do you want to send a v2 or prefer me do the update? Thanks, ferruh
quoted
Regards, PascalRegards, Keith