Re: [PATCH] net/tap: driver closing tx interface on queue setup
From: Wiles, Keith <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-30 15:05:15
On Jan 30, 2017, at 8:38 AM, Pascal Mazon [off-list ref] wrote: On 01/30/2017 12:00 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:> On 1/29/2017 2:12 AM, Keith Wiles wrote:quoted
quoted
The tap driver setup both rx and tx file descriptors when the rte_eth_rx_queue_setup() causing the tx to be closed when tx setup was called.Can you please describe the problem more. Without this patch rx->fd == tx->fd, with this patch rx and tx has different file descriptors. What was the wrong with rx and tx having same fd? As far as I can see, rte_eth_rx_queue_setup() won't close tx->fd, that function will do nothing if rx or tx has valid fd.quoted
Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles <redacted><...>Hi, The tap PMD recently broke for me because of this patch [1]. During init (eth_dev_tap_create()), the tap PMD allocates a shared RX/TX queue through tun_alloc(). The recent patch now releases existing queues in rx_queue_setup(), before adding new ones. When rx_queue_setup() is called, it uses close() calls on all shared queues, effectively deleting the netdevice. That's the main issue here. I tested Keith's patch [2], and it fixes that issue, using separate queues. There is however a couple of other queues-related issues in the tap PMD, but I'm not sure how to address them properly: 1. internals->fds[] gets filled only with RX queues (appart from index 0 that is common to both RX and TX). It means that RX queues only will be deleted when calling rte_pmd_tap_remove() or tap_tx_queue_release(). 2. tap_dev_stop() is not symmetrical with tap_dev_start(): queues won't get re-created after a stop. It may be best to keep the very first fd (created with tun_alloc() in eth_dev_tap_create() during probe) apart. And then add separate TX/RX queues in internals->txq[] and internals->rxq[] respectively. What do you think? [1] d00d7cc88335 ("ethdev: release queue before setting up") [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-January/056470.html
Lets keep the current patch just to get over the current problem if everyone agrees. I will address the comments Pascal brings up as a later updated to the TAP PMD or I can try to get the other issues cleaned up.
-- Pascal Mazon www.6wind.com
Regards, Keith