Re: [PATCH v2 22/32] app/testpmd: use multicast promiscuous mode on i40e
From: Lu, Wenzhuo <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-13 01:45:12
Hi Ferruh,
-----Original Message----- From: Yigit, Ferruh Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 11:02 PM To: Lu, Wenzhuo; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 22/32] app/testpmd: use multicast promiscuous mode on i40e On 12/7/2016 3:32 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:quoted
Add testpmd CLI to set VF multicast promiscuous mode on i40e. Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <redacted> --- app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 8 +++ 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+)diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c indexd39712e..7e7a016 100644--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c@@ -407,6 +407,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void*parsed_result, #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_PMD "set vf unicast-promisc (port_id) (vf_id) (on|off)\n" " Set unicast promiscuous mode for a VF from thePF.\n\n"quoted
+ + "set vf multicast-promisc (port_id) (vf_id) (on|off)\n" + " Set multicast promiscuous mode for a VF from thePF.\n\n" Why not "allmulti" instead of multicast-promisc? Also same comments as previous patch for help_str and documentation.
Sorry for the late. You're right, I should not change the word. Will send a V3.
<...>