Re: [PATCH 7/7] vhost: simplify features set/get
From: Xu, Qian Q <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-25 08:36:57
-----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxime Coquelin Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:19 PM To: Yuanhan Liu <redacted> Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] vhost: simplify features set/get On 08/25/2016 05:03 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:quoted
On 08/18/2016 10:48 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:quoted
No need to use a pointer to store/retrieve features. Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <redacted> --- lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 20 ++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.cb/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c index ef4a0c1..eee99e9 100644--- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c@@ -155,23 +155,22 @@ vhost_user_reset_owner(struct virtio_net *dev)/* * The features that we support are requested. */ -static int -vhost_user_get_features(uint64_t *pu) +static uint64_t +vhost_user_get_features(void) { - *pu = VHOST_FEATURES; - return 0; + return VHOST_FEATURES; }This is not the topic of this series, but I wonder if it could make sense to be able to override supported features at device init time.Not quite sure I understood it correctly: is rte_vhost_feature_disable() the answer you are looking for?
Not really. I meant a per-device supported features, and something you could set also via the vhost PMD options, without needing to recompile. But maybe it would make more sense to do it a guest level? Maxime -------Agreed, as you know we have the vhost PMD port and virtio-user PMD port and we can launch both vhost/virtio on the host, but we Can't set the mergeable in the command line, we may need add some feature settings for virtio-user interface. It will be much easier to Run tests or application. Qian