Re: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx statistic inconsistent
From: Zhao1, Wei <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-09 02:18:14
Hi ,Kyle Larose&Jingjing
-----Original Message----- From: Kyle Larose [mailto:eomereadig@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:22 AM To: Zhao1, Wei <redacted> Cc: Wu, Jingjing <redacted>; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx statistic inconsistent Hello Wei, On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Zhao1, Wei [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, Wujingjing and Kyle Larosequoted
-----Original Message----- From: Zhao1, Wei Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 11:27 AM To: Wu, Jingjing <redacted>; Lu, Wenzhuo [off-list ref] Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx statistic inconsistent Hi,Wu jingjing and wenzhuoquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Zhao1, Wei Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 4:58 PM To: 'Kyle Larose' <redacted> Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx statistic inconsistent Hi, Kyle Larose The core problem is i40e has no statistic of discard bytes, that means even if when ports are not stopped, the statistic rx_good_bytes is consist of discard bytes,is that reasonable? In other words, I can just minus discard bytes from rx_good_bytes if I can get discard bytes number, that is muchbetter.quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Kyle Larose [mailto:eomereadig@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 1:17 AM To: Zhao1, Wei <redacted> Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Rx statistic inconsistent On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Wei Zhao1 [off-list ref]wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
rx_good_bytes and rx_good_packets statistic is inconsistent when port stopped,ipackets statistic is minus the discard packets but rx_bytes statistic not.Also,i40e has no statistic of discard bytes, so we have to delete discard packets item fromrx_good_packets statistic.quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Fixes: 9aace75fc82e ("i40e: fix statistics") Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao1 <redacted> --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.cb/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 11a5804..553dfd9 100644--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c@@ -2319,8 +2319,7 @@ i40e_dev_stats_get(struct rte_eth_dev*dev,quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
struct rte_eth_stats *stats) stats->ipackets = pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_unicast + pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_multicast + - pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_broadcast - - pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_discards; + pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_broadcast; stats->opackets = pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.tx_unicast + pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.tx_multicast + pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.tx_broadcast; -- 2.5.5Is it not worse to report a received packet when no packet was actually received by the upper layers under normal operations than to ensure that packets and bytes are consistent when an interface is stopped? It seems like the first case is much more likely to occur than thesecond.quoted
Are we just introducing a new issue to fix another? How does this behaviour compare to other NICs? Does the ixgbe report discarded packets in its ipackets? My reading of the driver is thatit does not.quoted
quoted
quoted
In fact, it does something interesting to deal with the problem: from: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c /* * An errata states that gprc actually counts good + missed packets: * Workaround to set gprc to summated queue packet receives */ hw_stats-quoted
gprc = *total_qprc;total_gprc is equal to the sum of the qprc per queue. Can we do something similar on the i40e instead of adding unicast, mulitcast andbroadcast? I have checked ixgbe code about Rx statistic, in function ixgbe_read_stats_registers() we can find the rx_good_bytes and rx_good_packets statistic. It is listed below, we can see rx_good_packets is also just addition of Queue Packets Received Count and not minused discard packetnumber.quoted
quoted
Is there some wrong of understanding?My understanding of the problem can be broken into three parts: 1) In Unicast/Multicast/Broadcast packet counters are counting packets which were discarded 2) The corresponding byte counters count packets which were discarded. 3) There are no discarded byte counters. Our in bytes counter consists of the sum of in unicast, in multicast, and in broadcast. This sum includes discarded bytes, which we do not want, for two reasons. First, it would lead to misleading bitrate reports: people expect to see the amount of traffic actually handled. Second, it conflicts with the current packet counters (the counters without your change). Obviously if we could count the discarded bytes, we could subtract them. Alternatively, if we could count only received bytes which were not discarded, then we would not need to subtract discarded bytes from the received bytes counter. The ixgbe had a similar problem for packets, but presumably not bytes. So, I looked to it for inspiration. Presumably, the ixgbe per-queue counters count all received packets, per queue, and do not count discarded packets.Thus, is you take the sum of received packets across all queues, you can find the total number of received packets without discards included. Can we not do the same thing on the i40e, but for bytes? I just took a quick look at the datasheet, and I cannot see anything offhand that is equivalent to qbrc, which is what I would have used here. That said, I'm not an i40e expert, so I may have missed something. That's why I'm asking if it's possible. :)quoted
quoted
for (i = 0; i < IXGBE_QUEUE_STAT_COUNTERS; i++) { ...... *total_qprc += hw_stats->qprc[i]; *total_qbrc += hw_stats->qbrc[i]; ...... }The problem is i40e has no statistic of discard bytes, so it is impossible to minus discard bytes from rx_good_bytes . If you think it's notreasonable to Delete rx_discards iterm from rx_good_packets statistic, this patch will be superseded. Because I didn't find other way to correct this problem at present.quoted
I understand that there is no discard byte counter. Are there per-queue byte counters on the i40e, which do not count discarded byte, with which we could do a similar thing as the packet counters on the ixgbe? My concern is that both solutions aside from that are not good: either we count less packets received than bytes received, or we count discarded packets as received packets. Is there any chance that a firmware update in the future could fix this? This sort of inconsistency, or inability to provide *good* stats, really sucks for a NIC. Thanks, Kyle
According to your suggestion and meeting last week with harry ,I have supply a v3 patch for this problem. [dpdk-dev,v3] net/i40e: fix Rx statistic inconsistent , Permalink :/dev/patchwork/patch/15161/. This fix is avoiding statistic work when port is stopped.