Re: [PATCH v2] mk: fix acl library static linking
From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-01 08:05:12
On 30/06/2016 17:22, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
2016-06-30 17:14, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:quoted
On 30/06/2016 17:10, Thomas Monjalon wrote:quoted
2016-06-30 17:01, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:quoted
--- a/mk/rte.app.mk +++ b/mk/rte.app.mk@@ -76,12 +76,13 @@ _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG) += -lrte_ip_frag _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_METER) += -lrte_meter _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SCHED) += -lrte_sched _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_LPM) += -lrte_lpm -_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += -lrte_acl _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_JOBSTATS) += -lrte_jobstats _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_POWER) += -lrte_power _LDLIBS-y += --whole-archive +# librte_acl needs --whole-archive because of weak functions +_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += -lrte_acl _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_TIMER) += -lrte_timer _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_HASH) += -lrte_hash _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST) += -lrte_vhostI was suggesting to keep -lrte_acl at the same place in the group of algorithms libraries, in order to keep an order satisfying this comment: # Order is important: from higher level to lower level But I have not tested if --whole-archive -lrte_acl --no-whole-archive works.Sorry, I missed that. Why is important being before jobstats and power?It is not. But I think we need to have some groups. And ACL is probably at the same layer level as lpm, sched, etc.
I guess I just don't see the groups you are mentioning :) How are timer, hash and vhost in the same group? Wouldn't hash be in the same group as acl and lpm?