On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:02:22PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:

On 06/30/2016 03:00 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:

quoted

2016-06-29 17:27, Bruce Richardson:

quoted

Fix this by introducing two new functions to replace the old ones,
* rte_mempool_avail_count to replace rte_mempool_count
* rte_mempool_in_use_count to replace rte_mempool_free_count

This patch needs to be rebased please.

quoted

--- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_version.map
+++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_version.map

@@ -32,5 +32,6 @@ DPDK_16.07 {

	rte_mempool_populate_virt;
	rte_mempool_register_ops;
	rte_mempool_set_ops_byname;
+	rte_mempool_avail_count;

The "in_use_count" function is missing.

Its missing because the function is static inline. If you ask me, this would
be as fine time as any to remove that inlining ;)

	- Panu -

Yep, and yep.
V3 needed, I'll see what I can do.

/Bruce

quoted

Please keep alphabetical order.