Thread (204 messages) 204 messages, 8 authors, 2016-06-21

Re: [PATCH v5 00/25] DPDK PMD for ThunderX NIC device

From: Bruce Richardson <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 10:58:30

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:01:02PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:36:15AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
quoted
This patch set provides the initial version of DPDK PMD for the
built-in NIC device in Cavium ThunderX SoC family.

Implemented features and ThunderX nicvf PMD documentation added
in doc/guides/nics/overview.rst and doc/guides/nics/thunderx.rst
respectively in this patch set.

These patches are checked using checkpatch.sh with following
additional ignore option:
    options="$options --ignore=CAMELCASE,BRACKET_SPACE"
CAMELCASE - To accommodate PRIx64
BRACKET_SPACE - To accommodate AT&T inline line assembly in two places

This patch set is based on DPDK 16.07-RC1
and tested with git HEAD change-set
ca173a909538a2f1082cd0dcb4d778a97dab69c3 along with
following depended patch

http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11826/
ethdev: add tunnel and port RSS offload types
Hi Jerin,

hopefully a final set of comments before merge on this set, as it's looking
very good now.

* Two patches look like they need to be split, as they are combining multiple
  functions into one patch. They are:
    [dpdk-dev,v5,16/25] net/thunderx: add MTU set and promiscuous enable support
    [dpdk-dev,v5,20/25] net/thunderx: implement supported ptype get and Rx queue count
  For the other patches which add multiple functions, the functions seem to be
  logically related so I don't think there is a problem

* check-git-logs.sh is warning about a few of the commit messages being too long.
  Splitting patch 20 should fix one of those, but there are a few remaining.
  A number of titles refer to ThunderX in the message, but this is probably
  unnecessary, as the prefix already contains "net/thunderx" in it.
OK. I will send the next revision.
Please hold off a few hours, as I'm hoping to merge in the bnxt driver this
afternoon. If all goes well, I would appreciate it if you could base your patchset
off the rel_16_07 tree with that set applied - save me having to resolve conflicts
in files like the nic overview doc, which is always a pain to try and edit. :-)

Regards,
/Bruce
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help