Re: [PATCH v5 00/25] DPDK PMD for ThunderX NIC device
From: Bruce Richardson <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 10:58:30
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:01:02PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:36:15AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:quoted
This patch set provides the initial version of DPDK PMD for the built-in NIC device in Cavium ThunderX SoC family. Implemented features and ThunderX nicvf PMD documentation added in doc/guides/nics/overview.rst and doc/guides/nics/thunderx.rst respectively in this patch set. These patches are checked using checkpatch.sh with following additional ignore option: options="$options --ignore=CAMELCASE,BRACKET_SPACE" CAMELCASE - To accommodate PRIx64 BRACKET_SPACE - To accommodate AT&T inline line assembly in two places This patch set is based on DPDK 16.07-RC1 and tested with git HEAD change-set ca173a909538a2f1082cd0dcb4d778a97dab69c3 along with following depended patch http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11826/ ethdev: add tunnel and port RSS offload typesHi Jerin, hopefully a final set of comments before merge on this set, as it's looking very good now. * Two patches look like they need to be split, as they are combining multiple functions into one patch. They are: [dpdk-dev,v5,16/25] net/thunderx: add MTU set and promiscuous enable support [dpdk-dev,v5,20/25] net/thunderx: implement supported ptype get and Rx queue count For the other patches which add multiple functions, the functions seem to be logically related so I don't think there is a problem * check-git-logs.sh is warning about a few of the commit messages being too long. Splitting patch 20 should fix one of those, but there are a few remaining. A number of titles refer to ThunderX in the message, but this is probably unnecessary, as the prefix already contains "net/thunderx" in it.OK. I will send the next revision.
Please hold off a few hours, as I'm hoping to merge in the bnxt driver this afternoon. If all goes well, I would appreciate it if you could base your patchset off the rel_16_07 tree with that set applied - save me having to resolve conflicts in files like the nic overview doc, which is always a pain to try and edit. :-) Regards, /Bruce