Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] examples/ip_pipeline: fix build for x86_64 without SSE4.2
From: Dumitrescu, Cristian <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-30 13:57:57
-----Original Message----- From: Dumitrescu, Cristian Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 2:24 PM To: 'Thomas Monjalon' <redacted>; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Singh, Jasvinder <redacted>; Zhang, Roy Fan [off-list ref]; Hunt, David [off-list ref] Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] examples/ip_pipeline: fix build for x86_64 without SSE4.2 Importance: Highquoted
-----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 6:46 AM To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] examples/ip_pipeline: fix build for x86_64 without SSE4.2 The compiler cannot use _mm_crc32_u64: examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func.h:165:9: error: implicit declaration of function '_mm_crc32_u64' is invalid in C99 Fixes: 947024a26df7 ("examples/ip_pipeline: rework passthroughpipeline")quoted
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <redacted> --- examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func.hb/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func.h index 7846300..1953ad4 100644--- a/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func.h +++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func.h@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ hash_xor_key64(void *key, __rte_unused uint32_tkey_size, uint64_t seed) return (xor0 >> 32) ^ xor0; } -#if defined(__x86_64__) +#if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_2) #include <x86intrin.h> -- 2.7.0Hi Thomas, This is not the correct fix, as RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_2 is a flag that can only be tested at run-time (as result of calling function rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled()), not at build-time. The reason it appears to fix the build issue you are mentioning is the fact that this change results in disabling the __x86_64__ code branch. We need to revert this patch and look for a better option. What is the compiler that generates the build issue you are mentioning? We could not reproduce it with gcc 5 (gcc 5.3.1). Thanks, Cristian
I think the correct fix is: #if defined(__x86_64__) && (defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_2) || defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_CRC32)) We'll test it and send a patch asap. Thanks, Cristian