On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:27:02PM +0000, Kobylinski, MichalX wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:29 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: viktorin@rehivetech.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON

[snip]

quoted

Jerin Jacob (3):
  lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic
  lpm: add support for NEON
  maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and
    lpm

 MAINTAINERS                                |   3 +
 app/test/test_lpm.c                        |  21 ++--
 app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h                   |  67 +++++++++++++
 config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linuxapp-gcc   |   3 -
 config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc |   3 -
 lib/librte_lpm/Makefile                    |   6 ++
 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h                   |  99 ++-----------------
 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h              | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h               | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h  create mode 100644 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h
create mode 100644 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h

--
2.1.0

Hi Jerin,

Hi Michal,

Are you planning increase next_hop field for ARM? I extended next_hop field from 8 bits to 24 bits and created structure to configure LPM for x86.

Yes, I am planning to increase next_hop field for ARM as a separate
patch.  Let this base patchset get merges.

I will make  ARM specific changes for your new feature in
'rte_lpm_lookupx4' as a separate patch on top of your series.
So that in case if I want to go back to 8 bit then I can do it

Jerin

Please look at my patchset with proposal increase next_hop field and structure to configure.

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/

Best Regards,
Michal