2016-02-10 09:49, Bruce Richardson:

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:47:55PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:

quoted

2016-02-09 21:15, Liming Sun:

quoted

Looks like this patch serie has been merged into dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04.
What would be the usual way to submit changes for new comments? Would it be incremental changes (new commit) based on previous one? Thanks.

Good question.
I think it's better if Bruce drops or reverts the commits from dpdk-next-net
to let you re-submit a better new version.
Bruce, do you agree?

Unless there is something actually broken - that was previously working - by 
this patchset I'd rather not revert it. This patch was sitting acked for a month
which is a reasonable time for comments before applying it. Allowing people to
step up post-apply and look for patches being reverted is not something we want
to encourage IMHO. There are already too many reviews being done at the last
minute, and allowing reverts may make that situation worse, while applying acked
patches within a reasonable time - irrespective of whether people subsequently
find issues with them - should encourage earlier reviews, and makes it easier on
contributors.

Yes you are right.

Therefore I'd rather see any additional enhancements or changes
done as incremental patches on top of this set.

Regards,
/Bruce