Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2016-02-24

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] fix RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_ERR_RET RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET

From: Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-05 09:44:26

Hi,

2016-01-05 16:34, Reshma Pattan:
From: reshmapa <redacted>

Patches 1 and 2 removes RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_ERR_RET and
RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET macro usage from rte_ether and rte_cryptodev libraries to allow API
access to secondary process.
I don't understand the use case.
What is the role of the primary process if queues are configured by
the secondary process?
You have not answered to Michael:
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/030811.html

Other question first asked by Michael
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/030777.html
There are some comments asserting that it is not safe for secondary.
And your answer was it is safe for vdev? And what about PCI devices?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help