Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] eal: pci: introduce RTE_KDRV_VFIO_NOIOMMUi driver mode
From: Santosh Shukla <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-21 11:13:39
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:02 PM, David Marchand [off-list ref] wrote:
Santosh, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Santosh Shukla [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Adding RTE_KDRV_VFIO_NOIOMMU mode in kernel driver. Also including rte_vfio_is_noiommu() helper function. This function will parse /sys/bus/pci/device/<bus_addr>/ and make sure that - vfio noiommu mode set in kernel driver - pci device attached to vfio-noiommu driver only If both condition satisfies then set drv->kdrv = RTE_KDRV_VFIO_NOIOMMU Also did similar changes in virtio_rd/wr, Changes applicable for virtiospecquoted
0.95 only.This is a mode (specific to vfio), not a new kernel driver.
Yes, Specific to VFIO and this is why noiommu appended after vfio i.e.. __VFIO and __VFIO_NOIOMMU.
How come we need to distinguish between with/without iommu modes ?
By default vfio framework assumes iommu i.,e., iommu present. Unless user explicitly set "enable_unsafe_noiommu_mode" param. so in my opinion, we care to parse vfio driver for _noiommu_ mode only.
Should not vfio behave the same way from an api point of view ?
Yes It should. vfio gives similar file_ops i.e.. read/write/mmap/seek etc.. I am little confused on your question, do you see any issue in vfio bar rd/wr api implementation?
Regards, -- David Marchand