Thread (120 messages) 120 messages, 7 authors, 2016-06-07

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio: Add a new layer to abstract pci access method

From: Tan, Jianfeng <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-18 13:13:14

Hi Tetsuya,

On 1/18/2016 5:13 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
The patches abstract pci access method of virtio-net PMD.
The patch should be on Yuanhan's below patch series.
  - [PATCH v4 0/8] virtio 1.0 enabling for virtio pmd driver


Tetsuya Mukawa (3):
   virtio: Change the parameter order of io_write8/16/32()
   virtio: move rte_eal_pci_unmap_device() to virtio_pci.c
   virtio: Add a new layer to abstract pci access method

  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c |   4 +-
  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c    | 468 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h    |  33 ++-
  3 files changed, 369 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
Now I believe we will become more clear about the difference of our two 
implementations.

I was planning to just implement another struct virtio_pci_ops because 
it's going the long way round for my implementation to translate 
virtio_pci_ops to ioport/pci configuration space rd/wr then back to 
sendmsg/ioctl. And in my implementation, there's no need to 
differentiate legacy/modern device.

As I understand, your implementation does not need another 
implementation of struct virtio_pci_ops, but you need different 
implementation in lower layer as this patch show. You want to support 
both legacy/modern device, right?

By the way, this patch looks good to me.

Thanks,
Jianfeng
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help