Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: restore tx data ring support
From: Yong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-13 02:20:04
On 1/5/16, 4:48 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:12:55 -0800 Yong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
@@ -365,6 +366,14 @@ vmxnet3_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, break; } + if (rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(txm) <= VMXNET3_HDR_COPY_SIZE) { + struct Vmxnet3_TxDataDesc *tdd; + + tdd = txq->data_ring.base + txq->cmd_ring.next2fill; + copy_size = rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(txm); + rte_memcpy(tdd->data, rte_pktmbuf_mtod(txm, char *), copy_size); + }Good idea to use a local region which optmizes the copy in the host, but this implementation needs to be more general. As written it is broken for multi-segment packets. A multi-segment packet will have a pktlen >= datalen as in: m -> mb_segs=3, pktlen=1200, datalen=200 -> datalen=900 -> datalen=100 There are two ways to fix this. You could test for nb_segs == 1 or better yet. Optimize each segment it might be that the first segment (or tail segment) would fit in the available data area.
Currently the vmxnet3 backend has a limitation of 128B data area so
it should work even for the multi-segmented pkt shown above. But
I agree it does not work for all multi-segmented packets. The
following packet will be such an example.
m -> nb_segs=3, pktlen=128, datalen=64
-> datalen=32
-> datalen=32
It’s unclear if/how we might get into such a multi-segmented pkt
but I agree we should handle this case. Patch updated taking the
simple approach (checking for nb_segs == 1). I’ll leave the
optimization as a future patch.