Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2016-01-13

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: restore tx data ring support

From: Yong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-13 02:20:04

On 1/5/16, 4:48 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue,  5 Jan 2016 16:12:55 -0800
Yong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -365,6 +366,14 @@ vmxnet3_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
 			break;
 		}
 
+		if (rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(txm) <= VMXNET3_HDR_COPY_SIZE) {
+			struct Vmxnet3_TxDataDesc *tdd;
+
+			tdd = txq->data_ring.base + txq->cmd_ring.next2fill;
+			copy_size = rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(txm);
+			rte_memcpy(tdd->data, rte_pktmbuf_mtod(txm, char *), copy_size);
+		}
Good idea to use a local region which optmizes the copy in the host,
but this implementation needs to be more general.

As written it is broken for multi-segment packets. A multi-segment
packet will have a pktlen >= datalen as in:
 m -> mb_segs=3, pktlen=1200, datalen=200
   -> datalen=900
   -> datalen=100

There are two ways to fix this. You could test for nb_segs == 1
or better yet. Optimize each segment it might be that the first
segment (or tail segment) would fit in the available data area.
Currently the vmxnet3 backend has a limitation of 128B data area so
it should work even for the multi-segmented pkt shown above. But
I agree it does not work for all multi-segmented packets.  The
following packet will be such an example.

m -> nb_segs=3, pktlen=128, datalen=64
    -> datalen=32
    -> datalen=32


It’s unclear if/how we might get into such a multi-segmented pkt
but I agree we should handle this case.  Patch updated taking the
simple approach (checking for nb_segs == 1).  I’ll leave the
optimization as a future patch.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help