Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2015-07-30

Re: i40e xmit path HW limitation

flat view

From: Zhang, Helin <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-30 16:10:38

-----Original Message-----
From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz@cloudius-systems.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 7:58 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin; Zhang, Helin
Subject: RFC: i40e xmit path HW limitation

Hi, Konstantin, Helin,
there is a documented limitation of xl710 controllers (i40e driver) which is not
handled in any way by a DPDK driver.
 From the datasheet chapter 8.4.1:

"• A single transmit packet may span up to 8 buffers (up to 8 data descriptors per
packet including both the header and payload buffers).
• The total number of data descriptors for the whole TSO (explained later on in
this chapter) is unlimited as long as each segment within the TSO obeys the
previous rule (up to 8 data descriptors per segment for both the TSO header and
the segment payload buffers)."
Yes, I remember the RX side just supports 5 segments per packet receiving.
But what's the possible issue you thought about?
This means that, for instance, long cluster with small fragments has to be
linearized before it may be placed on the HW ring.
What type of size of the small fragments? Basically 2KB is the default size of mbuf of most
example applications. 2KB x 8 is bigger than 1.5KB. So it is enough for the maximum
packet size we supported.
If 1KB mbuf is used, don't expect it can transmit more than 8KB size of packet.
In more standard environments like Linux or FreeBSD drivers the solution is
straight forward - call skb_linearize()/m_collapse() corresponding.
In the non-conformist environment like DPDK life is not that easy - there is no
easy way to collapse the cluster into a linear buffer from inside the device driver
since device driver doesn't allocate memory in a fast path and utilizes the user
allocated pools only.
Here are two proposals for a solution:

 1. We may provide a callback that would return a user TRUE if a give
    cluster has to be linearized and it should always be called before
    rte_eth_tx_burst(). Alternatively it may be called from inside the
    rte_eth_tx_burst() and rte_eth_tx_burst() is changed to return some
    error code for a case when one of the clusters it's given has to be
    linearized.
 2. Another option is to allocate a mempool in the driver with the
    elements consuming a single page each (standard 2KB buffers would
    do). Number of elements in the pool should be as Tx ring length
    multiplied by "64KB/(linear data length of the buffer in the pool
    above)". Here I use 64KB as a maximum packet length and not taking
    into an account esoteric things like "Giant" TSO mentioned in the
    spec above. Then we may actually go and linearize the cluster if
    needed on top of the buffers from the pool above, post the buffer
    from the mempool above on the HW ring, link the original cluster to
    that new cluster (using the private data) and release it when the
    send is done.


The first is a change in the API and would require from the application some
additional handling (linearization). The second would require some additional
memory but would keep all dirty details inside the driver and would leave the
rest of the code intact.

Pls., comment.

thanks,
vlad
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help