Re: [PATCH 4/4] lib/librte_eal: Optimized memcpy in arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h for both SSE and AVX platforms
From: Wang, Zhihong <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-27 05:12:03
-----Original Message----- From: Wodkowski, PawelX Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 10:43 PM To: Wang, Zhihong; dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] lib/librte_eal: Optimized memcpy in arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h for both SSE and AVX platforms Hi, I must say: greate work. I have some small comments:quoted
+/** + * Macro for copying unaligned block from one location to another, + * 47 bytes leftover maximum, + * locations should not overlap. + * Requirements: + * - Store is aligned + * - Load offset is <offset>, which must be immediate value within [1, 15] + * - For <src>, make sure <offset> bit backwards & <16 - offset> bitforwardsquoted
are available for loading + * - <dst>, <src>, <len> must be variables + * - __m128i <xmm0> ~ <xmm8> must be pre-defined + */ +#define MOVEUNALIGNED_LEFT47(dst, src, len, offset) \ +{ \...quoted
+}Why not do { ... } while(0) or ({ ... }) ? This could have unpredictable side effects. Second: Why you completely substitute #define rte_memcpy(dst, src, n) \ ({ (__builtin_constant_p(n)) ? \ memcpy((dst), (src), (n)) : \ rte_memcpy_func((dst), (src), (n)); }) with inline rte_memcpy()? This construction can help compiler to deduce which version to use (static?) inline implementation or call external function. Did you try 'extern inline' type? It could help reducing compilation time.
Hi Pawel, Good call on "MOVEUNALIGNED_LEFT47". Thanks! I removed the conditional __builtin_constant_p(n) because it calls glibc memcpy when the parameter is constant, while rte_memcpy has better performance there. Current long compile time is caused by too many function calls, I'll fix that in the next version. Zhihong (John)