Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2015-01-08

Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] ether: Check VMDq RSS mode

From: Vlad Zolotarov <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-08 18:48:52

On 01/08/15 11:19, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
On 01/07/15 08:32, Ouyang Changchun wrote:
quoted
Check mq mode for VMDq RSS, handle it correctly instead of returning 
an error;
Also remove the limitation of per pool queue number has max value of 
1, because
the per pool queue number could be 2 or 4 if it is VMDq RSS mode;

The number of rxq specified in config will determine the mq mode for 
VMDq RSS.

Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang <redacted>

changes in v5:
   - Fix '<' issue, it should be '<=' to test rxq number;
   - Extract a function to remove the embeded switch-case statement.

---
  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 50 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c 
b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index 95f2ceb..8363e26 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -503,6 +503,31 @@ rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_config(struct rte_eth_dev 
*dev, uint16_t nb_queues)
  }
    static int
+rte_eth_dev_check_vf_rss_rxq_num(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q)
+{
+    struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
+    switch (nb_rx_q) {
+    case 1:
+    case 2:
+        RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active =
+            ETH_64_POOLS;
+        break;
+    case 4:
+        RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active =
+            ETH_32_POOLS;
+        break;
+    default:
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool = nb_rx_q;
+    RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).def_pool_q_idx =
+        dev->pci_dev->max_vfs * nb_rx_q;
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static int
  rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, 
uint16_t nb_tx_q,
                const struct rte_eth_conf *dev_conf)
  {
@@ -510,8 +535,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, 
uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
        if (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active != 0) {
          /* check multi-queue mode */
-        if ((dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_RSS) ||
-            (dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_DCB) ||
+        if ((dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_DCB) ||
              (dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_DCB_RSS) ||
              (dev_conf->txmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_TX_DCB)) {
              /* SRIOV only works in VMDq enable mode */
@@ -525,7 +549,6 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, 
uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
          }
            switch (dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode) {
-        case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS:
          case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_DCB:
          case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_DCB_RSS:
              /* DCB/RSS VMDQ in SRIOV mode, not implement yet */
@@ -534,6 +557,25 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, 
uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
                      "unsupported VMDQ mq_mode rx %u\n",
                      port_id, dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode);
              return (-EINVAL);
+        case ETH_MQ_RX_RSS:
+            PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%" PRIu8
+                    " SRIOV active, "
+                    "Rx mq mode is changed from:"
+                    "mq_mode %u into VMDQ mq_mode %u\n",
+                    port_id,
+                    dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode,
+                    dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode);
+        case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS:
+            dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS;
+            if (nb_rx_q <= RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool)
+                if (rte_eth_dev_check_vf_rss_rxq_num(port_id, 
nb_rx_q) != 0) {
+                    PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d"
+                        " SRIOV active, invalid queue"
+                        " number for VMDQ RSS\n",
+                        port_id);
Some nitpicking here: I'd add the allowed values descriptions to the 
error message. Something like: "invalid queue number for VMDQ RSS. 
Allowed values are 1, 2 or 4\n".
quoted
+                    return -EINVAL;
+                }
+            break;
          default: /* ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_ONLY or ETH_MQ_RX_NONE */
              /* if nothing mq mode configure, use default scheme */
              dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_ONLY;
@@ -553,8 +595,6 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, 
uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
          default: /* ETH_MQ_TX_VMDQ_ONLY or ETH_MQ_TX_NONE */
              /* if nothing mq mode configure, use default scheme */
              dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_TX_VMDQ_ONLY;
-            if (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool > 1)
-                RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool = 1;
I'm not sure u may just remove it. These lines originally belong to a 
different flow. Are u sure u can remove them like that? What if the 
mq_mode is ETH_MQ_RX_NONE and nb_q_per_pool has been initialized to 4 
or 8 in ixgbe_pf_host_init()?
I misread the patch - these lines belong to the txmode.mq_mode switch 
case. I think it's ok to remove these really strange lines here. And 
when I look at it i think for the similar reasons the similar lines 
should be removed in the Rx case too: consider non-RSS case with MQ DCB 
Tx configuration.
quoted
              break;
          }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help