Re: Signature filter for virtual function

Yes, 82599.
I'll be updated.

Thank you for your answer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:41 AM
To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function


Are you talking about 82599?

I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be volunteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are eager to contribute to it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan-gsmmuRSnEZq1Z/+hSey0Gg@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM
To: Wu, Jingjing; dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function

Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF.
Will it be implemented in future releases ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM
To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function

Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or 
director packet to different queue in a VF?

For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, 
the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try).
But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead.

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan-gsmmuRSnEZq1Z/+hSey0Gg@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM
To: Wu, Jingjing; dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function

Hi,

Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx queues by a VF ?
Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?

Thanks,
Ilan B


-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function

Hi

Flow director is not supported on VF now.
I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Ilan 
Borenshtein
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

Hello,

I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using 
rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
The function returns with ENOTSUP.
Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?

Thanks,
Ilan B