On 18/02/25 15:12, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:

On 18/02/2025 10:58, Juri Lelli wrote:

quoted

Hi!

On 17/02/25 17:08, Juri Lelli wrote:

quoted

On 14/02/25 10:05, Jon Hunter wrote:

...

quoted

At this point I believe you triggered suspend.

quoted

[   57.290150] Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
[   57.335619] tegra-xusb 3530000.usb: Firmware timestamp: 2020-07-06 13:39:28 UTC
[   57.353364] dwc-eth-dwmac 2490000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down
[   57.397022] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...

Offlining CPU5.

quoted

[   57.400904] dl_bw_manage: cpu=5 cap=3072 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=209712 dl_bw_cpus=4 type=DYN span=0,3-5
[   57.400949] CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
[   57.415298] span=1-2
[   57.417483] __dl_sub: cpus=3 tsk_bw=52428 total_bw=157284 span=0,3-5 type=DYN
[   57.417487] __dl_server_detach_root: cpu=0 rd_span=0,3-5 total_bw=157284
[   57.417496] rq_attach_root: cpu=0 old_span=NULL new_span=1-2
[   57.417501] __dl_add: cpus=3 tsk_bw=52428 total_bw=157284 span=0-2 type=DEF
[   57.417504] __dl_server_attach_root: cpu=0 rd_span=0-2 total_bw=157284
[   57.417507] CPU3 attaching NULL sched-domain.
[   57.454804] span=0-2
[   57.456987] __dl_sub: cpus=2 tsk_bw=52428 total_bw=104856 span=3-5 type=DYN
[   57.456990] __dl_server_detach_root: cpu=3 rd_span=3-5 total_bw=104856
[   57.456998] rq_attach_root: cpu=3 old_span=NULL new_span=0-2
[   57.457000] __dl_add: cpus=4 tsk_bw=52428 total_bw=209712 span=0-3 type=DEF
[   57.457003] __dl_server_attach_root: cpu=3 rd_span=0-3 total_bw=209712
[   57.457006] CPU4 attaching NULL sched-domain.
[   57.493964] span=0-3
[   57.496152] __dl_sub: cpus=1 tsk_bw=52428 total_bw=52428 span=4-5 type=DYN
[   57.496156] __dl_server_detach_root: cpu=4 rd_span=4-5 total_bw=52428
[   57.496162] rq_attach_root: cpu=4 old_span=NULL new_span=0-3
[   57.496165] __dl_add: cpus=5 tsk_bw=52428 total_bw=262140 span=0-4 type=DEF
[   57.496168] __dl_server_attach_root: cpu=4 rd_span=0-4 total_bw=262140
[   57.496171] CPU5 attaching NULL sched-domain.
[   57.532952] span=0-4
[   57.535143] rq_attach_root: cpu=5 old_span= new_span=0-4
[   57.535147] __dl_add: cpus=5 tsk_bw=52428 total_bw=314568 span=0-5 type=DEF

Maybe we shouldn't add the dl_server contribution of a CPU that is going
to be offline.

I tried to implement this idea and ended up with the following. As usual
also pushed it to the branch on github. Could you please update and
re-test?

Another thing that I noticed is that in my case an hotplug operation
generating a sched/root domain rebuild ends up calling dl_rebuild_
rd_accounting() (from partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains()) which
resets accounting for def and dyn domains. In your case (looking again
at the last dmesg you shared) I don't see this call, so I wonder if for
some reason related to your setup we do the rebuild by calling partition_
sched_domains() (instead of partition_and_rebuild_) and this doesn't
call dl_rebuild_rd_accounting() after partition_sched_domains_locked() -
maybe it should? Dietmar, Christian, Peter, what do you think?

Yeah, looks like suspend/resume behaves differently compared to CPU hotplug.

On my Juno [L b b L L L]
                ^^^
                isolcpus=[2,3]

# ps2 | grep DLN
   98    98 S 140      0   - DLN sugov:0
   99    99 S 140      0   - DLN sugov:1

# taskset -p 98; taskset -p 99
pid 98's current affinity mask: 39
pid 99's current affinity mask: 6


[   87.679282] partition_sched_domains() called
...
[   87.684013] partition_sched_domains() called
...
[   87.687961] partition_sched_domains() called
...
[   87.689419] psci: CPU3 killed (polled 0 ms)
[   87.689715] __dl_bw_capacity() mask=2-5 cap=1024
[   87.689739] dl_bw_cpus() cpu=6 rd->span=2-5 cpu_active_mask=0-2 cpus=1
[   87.689757] dl_bw_manage: cpu=2 cap=0 fair_server_bw=52428
total_bw=209712 dl_bw_cpus=1 type=DEF span=2-5
[   87.689775] dl_bw_cpus() cpu=6 rd->span=2-5 cpu_active_mask=0-2 cpus=1
[   87.689789] dl_bw_manage() cpu=2 cap=0 overflow=1 return=-16
[   87.689864] Error taking CPU2 down: -16                       <-- !!!
...
[   87.690674] partition_sched_domains() called
...
[   87.691496] partition_sched_domains() called
...
[   87.693702] partition_sched_domains() called
...
[   87.695819] partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains() called

Ah, OK. Did you try with my last proposed change?