Re: Expensive memory.stat + cpu.stat reads
From: Waiman Long <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-11 22:28:20
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 8/11/23 18:03, Ivan Babrou wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:30 PM Ivan Babrou [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:25 PM Ivan Babrou [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
My understanding of mem-stat and cpu-stat is that they are independent of each other. In theory, reading one shouldn't affect the performance of reading the others. Since you are doing mem-stat and cpu-stat reading repetitively in a loop, it is likely that all the data are in the cache most of the time resulting in very fast processing time. If it happens that the specific memory location of mem-stat and cpu-stat data are such that reading one will cause the other data to be flushed out of the cache and have to be re-read from memory again, you could see significant performance regression. It is one of the possible causes, but I may be wrong.Do you think it's somewhat similar to how iterating a matrix in rows is faster than in columns due to sequential vs random memory reads? * https://stackoverflow.com/q/9936132 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Row-_and_column-major_order * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_interchange I've had a similar suspicion and it would be good to confirm whether it's that or something else. I can probably collect perf counters for different runs, but I'm not sure which ones I'll need. In a similar vein, if we could come up with a tracepoint that would tell us the amount of work done (or any other relevant metric that would help) during rstat flushing, I can certainly collect that information as well for every reading combination.Since cgroup_rstat_flush_locked appears in flamegraphs for both fast (discrete) and slow (combined) cases, I grabbed some stats for it: * Slow: completed: 19.43s [manual / mem-stat + cpu-stat] $ sudo /usr/share/bcc/tools/funclatency -uT cgroup_rstat_flush_locked Tracing 1 functions for "cgroup_rstat_flush_locked"... Hit Ctrl-C to end. ^C 00:12:55 usecs : count distribution 0 -> 1 : 0 | | 2 -> 3 : 0 | | 4 -> 7 : 0 | | 8 -> 15 : 0 | | 16 -> 31 : 0 | | 32 -> 63 : 0 | | 64 -> 127 : 1 | | 128 -> 255 : 191 |************ | 256 -> 511 : 590 |****************************************| 512 -> 1023 : 186 |************ | 1024 -> 2047 : 2 | | 2048 -> 4095 : 0 | | 4096 -> 8191 : 0 | | 8192 -> 16383 : 504 |********************************** | 16384 -> 32767 : 514 |********************************** | 32768 -> 65535 : 3 | | 65536 -> 131071 : 1 | | avg = 8852 usecs, total: 17633268 usecs, count: 1992 * Fast: completed: 0.95s [manual / mem-stat] completed: 0.05s [manual / cpu-stat] $ sudo /usr/share/bcc/tools/funclatency -uT cgroup_rstat_flush_locked Tracing 1 functions for "cgroup_rstat_flush_locked"... Hit Ctrl-C to end. ^C 00:13:27 usecs : count distribution 0 -> 1 : 0 | | 2 -> 3 : 0 | | 4 -> 7 : 499 |****************************************| 8 -> 15 : 253 |******************** | 16 -> 31 : 191 |*************** | 32 -> 63 : 41 |*** | 64 -> 127 : 12 | | 128 -> 255 : 2 | | 256 -> 511 : 2 | | 512 -> 1023 : 0 | | 1024 -> 2047 : 0 | | 2048 -> 4095 : 0 | | 4096 -> 8191 : 0 | | 8192 -> 16383 : 34 |** | 16384 -> 32767 : 21 |* | avg = 857 usecs, total: 904762 usecs, count: 1055 There's a different number of calls into cgroup_rstat_flush_locked and they are much slower in the slow case. There are also two bands in the slow case, with 8ms..32ms having the half of the calls. For mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush: * Slow: completed: 32.77s [manual / mem-stat + cpu-stat] $ sudo /usr/share/bcc/tools/funclatency -uT mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush Tracing 1 functions for "mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush"... Hit Ctrl-C to end. ^C 00:21:25 usecs : count distribution 0 -> 1 : 93078 |* | 2 -> 3 : 3397714 |****************************************| 4 -> 7 : 1009440 |*********** | 8 -> 15 : 168013 |* | 16 -> 31 : 93 | | avg = 3 usecs, total: 17189289 usecs, count: 4668338 * Fast: completed: 0.16s [manual / mem-stat] completed: 0.04s [manual / cpu-stat] $ sudo /usr/share/bcc/tools/funclatency -uT mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush Tracing 1 functions for "mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush"... Hit Ctrl-C to end. ^C 00:21:57 usecs : count distribution 0 -> 1 : 1441 |*** | 2 -> 3 : 18780 |****************************************| 4 -> 7 : 4826 |********** | 8 -> 15 : 732 |* | 16 -> 31 : 1 | | avg = 3 usecs, total: 89174 usecs, count: 25780 There's an 181x difference in the number of calls into mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush. Does this provide a clue? Perhaps cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated is yielding a ton more iterations for some reason here? * https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1/source/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c#L196 It's inlined, but I can place a probe into the loop: 7 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { 8 raw_spinlock_t *cpu_lock = per_cpu_ptr(&cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock, cpu); 10 struct cgroup *pos = NULL; unsigned long flags; /* * The _irqsave() is needed because cgroup_rstat_lock is * spinlock_t which is a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT. Acquiring * this lock with the _irq() suffix only disables interrupts on * a non-PREEMPT_RT kernel. The raw_spinlock_t below disables * interrupts on both configurations. The _irqsave() ensures * that interrupts are always disabled and later restored. */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(cpu_lock, flags); while ((pos = cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated(pos, cgrp, cpu))) { struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; cgroup_base_stat_flush(pos, cpu); 26 bpf_rstat_flush(pos, cgroup_parent(pos), cpu); 28 rcu_read_lock(); 29 list_for_each_entry_rcu(css, &pos->rstat_css_list, rstat_css_node) 31 css->ss->css_rstat_flush(css, cpu); 32 rcu_read_unlock(); } 34 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpu_lock, flags); I added probes on both line 26 and line 31 to catch the middle and inner loops. * Slow: completed: 32.97s [manual / mem-stat + cpu-stat] Performance counter stats for '/tmp/derp': 4,702,570 probe:cgroup_rstat_flush_locked_L26 9,301,436 probe:cgroup_rstat_flush_locked_L31 * Fast: completed: 0.17s [manual / mem-stat] completed: 0.34s [manual / cpu-stat] Performance counter stats for '/tmp/derp': 31,769 probe:cgroup_rstat_flush_locked_L26 62,849 probe:cgroup_rstat_flush_locked_L31 It definitely looks like cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated is yielding a lot more positions. I'm going to sign off for the week, but let me know if I should place any more probes to nail this down.I spent some time looking into this and I think I landed on a fix: * https://github.com/bobrik/linux/commit/50b627811d54 I'm not 100% sure if it's the right fix for the issue, but it reduces the runtime significantly.
It looks like the overhead of mem_cgroup_flush_stats() may be the cause
of the performance regression. So what version of the Linux kernel are
you using? From the patch listed in the URL above, it doesn't seem like
you are using the latest kernel.
The latest upstream kernel already have patches that reduce rstat
flushing overhead like commit 11192d9c124 ("memcg: flush stats only if
updated"). Have you try to reproduce it with the latest kernel?
Cheers,
Longman