Thread (26 messages) flat view 26 messages, 5 authors, 2022-12-08

Re: Low TCP throughput due to vmpressure with swap enabled

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-22 18:24:09
Also in: linux-mm, lkml, netdev

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:11 AM Ivan Babrou [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:01 AM Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:53 PM Ivan Babrou [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hello,

We have observed a negative TCP throughput behavior from the following commit:

* 8e8ae645249b mm: memcontrol: hook up vmpressure to socket pressure

It landed back in 2016 in v4.5, so it's not exactly a new issue.

The crux of the issue is that in some cases with swap present the
workload can be unfairly throttled in terms of TCP throughput.
I guess defining 'fairness' in such a scenario is nearly impossible.

Have you tried changing /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem  (and/or tcp_wmem) ?
Defaults are quite conservative.
Yes, our max sizes are much higher than the defaults. I don't see how
it matters though. The issue is that the kernel clamps rcv_sshtrehsh
at 4 x advmss.
There are some places (eg tcp_clamp_window) where we have this
additional condition :

sk_memory_allocated(sk) < sk_prot_mem_limits(sk, 0)

So I was suggesting maybe to add a similar condition to tcp_try_rmem_schedule()

Then adjust tcp_rmem for your needs.

 No matter how much TCP memory you end up using, the
kernel will clamp based on responsiveness to memory reclaim, which in
turn depends on swap presence. We're seeing it in production with tens
of thousands of sockets and high max tcp_rmem and I'm able to
replicate the same issue in my vm with the default sysctl values.
quoted
If for your workload you want to ensure a minimum amount of memory per
TCP socket,
that might be good enough.
That's not my goal at all. We don't have a problem with TCP memory
consumption. Our issue is low throughput because vmpressure() thinks
that the cgroup is memory constrained when it most definitely is not.
OK, then I will stop commenting I guess :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help