Hello.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 08:15:16AM +0800, brookxu [off-list ref] wrote:
1. If a large number of containers are created and deleted,
there will be a lot of error logs.
2. According to an error log, we cannot better understand
the actual pressure of resources.
Therefore, perhaps we should use a failcnt counter to count
the number of failures, so that we can easily understand the
actual pressure of resources and avoid too many error log..
This is an understandable use case and generally the implementation via
the counter is good as well.
However, the non-hierarchical failcnt interface looks like v1ism to me
(I think new features should come with v2 first in mind).
What about exposing this in misc.events file with max.$res_name entries?
Or if the hierarchical reporting is unnecessary now, there can be just
misc.events.local for starters.
(That reminds me the forgotten pids.events[.local] rework [1], oops.)
Michal
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191128172612.10259-1-mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org/#t