Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm, memcg: narrow the scope of percpu_charge_mutex
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-07-30 06:46:55
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-07-30 06:46:55
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Thu 29-07-21 20:57:52, Miaohe Lin wrote:
Since percpu_charge_mutex is only used inside drain_all_stock(), we can narrow the scope of percpu_charge_mutex by moving it here.
Makes sense and this is usually my preference as well. We used to have other caller back then so I couldn't.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Thanks!
--- mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 6580c2381a3e..a03e24e57cd9 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -2050,7 +2050,6 @@ struct memcg_stock_pcp { #define FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE 0 }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct memcg_stock_pcp, memcg_stock); -static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex); #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM static void drain_obj_stock(struct obj_stock *stock);@@ -2209,6 +2208,7 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages) */ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg) { + static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex); int cpu, curcpu; /* If someone's already draining, avoid adding running more workers. */-- 2.23.0
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs