Re: [PATCH 1/9] memcg: accounting for allocations called with disabled BH
From: Shakeel Butt <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-09 19:39:56
Also in:
linux-mm
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:04 AM Vasily Averin [off-list ref] wrote:
in_interrupt() check in memcg_kmem_bypass() is incorrect because it does not allow to account memory allocation called from task context with disabled BH, i.e. inside spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() sections Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <redacted>
In that file in_interrupt() is used at other places too. Should we change those too?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 845eec0..568f2cb 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static __always_inline bool memcg_kmem_bypass(void) return false; /* Memcg to charge can't be determined. */ - if (in_interrupt() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) + if (!in_task() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) return true; return false; --1.8.3.1