Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: Fix missing mem cgroup soft limit tree updates
From: Tim Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-22 17:47:24
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Tim Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-22 17:47:24
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 2/22/21 12:41 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
Ah, that's true. The added check for soft_limit_excess is not needed. Do you think it is still a good idea to add patch 3 to restrict the uncharge update in page batch of the same node and cgroup?I would rather drop it. The less the soft limit reclaim code is spread around the better.
Let's drop patch 3 then. I find patch 2 is the most critical one in this series. Without that patch some cgroups exceeds the soft limit excess very badly. Tim