Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] hugetlb: disable region_add file_region coalescing
From: Mina Almasry <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-04 21:19:32
Also in:
linux-kselftest, linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:15 PM Mike Kravetz [off-list ref] wrote:
On 11/4/19 1:04 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:23 PM Mike Kravetz [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 10/29/19 6:36 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:quoted
static long add_reservation_in_range(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t, - bool count_only) + long *regions_needed, bool count_only) { - long chg = 0; + long add = 0; struct list_head *head = &resv->regions; + long last_accounted_offset = f; struct file_region *rg = NULL, *trg = NULL, *nrg = NULL; - /* Locate the region we are before or in. */ - list_for_each_entry (rg, head, link) - if (f <= rg->to) - break; + if (regions_needed) + *regions_needed = 0; - /* Round our left edge to the current segment if it encloses us. */ - if (f > rg->from) - f = rg->from; - - chg = t - f; + /* In this loop, we essentially handle an entry for the range + * [last_accounted_offset, rg->from), at every iteration, with some + * bounds checking. + */ + list_for_each_entry_safe(rg, trg, head, link) { + /* Skip irrelevant regions that start before our range. */ + if (rg->from < f) { + /* If this region ends after the last accounted offset, + * then we need to update last_accounted_offset. + */ + if (rg->to > last_accounted_offset) + last_accounted_offset = rg->to; + continue; + } - /* Check for and consume any regions we now overlap with. */ - nrg = rg; - list_for_each_entry_safe (rg, trg, rg->link.prev, link) { - if (&rg->link == head) - break; + /* When we find a region that starts beyond our range, we've + * finished. + */ if (rg->from > t) break; - /* We overlap with this area, if it extends further than - * us then we must extend ourselves. Account for its - * existing reservation. + /* Add an entry for last_accounted_offset -> rg->from, and + * update last_accounted_offset. */ - if (rg->to > t) { - chg += rg->to - t; - t = rg->to; + if (rg->from > last_accounted_offset) { + add += rg->from - last_accounted_offset; + if (!count_only) { + nrg = get_file_region_entry_from_cache( + resv, last_accounted_offset, rg->from); + list_add(&nrg->link, rg->link.prev); + } else if (regions_needed) + *regions_needed += 1; } - chg -= rg->to - rg->from; - if (!count_only && rg != nrg) { - list_del(&rg->link); - kfree(rg); - } + last_accounted_offset = rg->to;That last assignment is unneeded. Correct?Not to make you nervous, but this assignment is needed. The basic idea is that there are 2 loop invariants here: 1. Everything before last_accounted_offset is filled in with file_regions. 2. rg points to the first region past last_account_offset. Each loop iteration compares rg->from to last_accounted_offset, and if there is a gap, it creates a new region to fill this gap. Then this assignment restores loop invariant #2 by assigning last_accounted_offset to rg->to, since now everything before rg->to is filled in with file_regions.My apologies!quoted
quoted
quoted
} - if (!count_only) { - nrg->from = f; - nrg->to = t; + /* Handle the case where our range extends beyond + * last_accounted_offset. + */ + if (last_accounted_offset < t) { + add += t - last_accounted_offset; + if (!count_only) { + nrg = get_file_region_entry_from_cache( + resv, last_accounted_offset, t); + list_add(&nrg->link, rg->link.prev); + } else if (regions_needed) + *regions_needed += 1; + last_accounted_offset = t;The question about an unnecessary assignment was supposed to be directed at the above line.
Oh, yes. That assignment is completely unnecessary; the function just exits after pretty much. Will remove, thanks!
-- Mike Kravetzquoted
quoted
quoted
} - return chg; + return add; }