Re: [PATCH 1/4] numa: introduce per-cgroup numa balancing locality, statistic
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Date: 2019-07-19 16:47:19
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Date: 2019-07-19 16:47:19
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:41:36AM +0800, 王贇 [off-list ref] wrote:
Actually whatever the memory node sets or cpu allow sets is, it will take effect on task's behavior regarding memory location and cpu location, while the locality only care about the results rather than the sets.
My previous response missed much of the context, so it was a bit off. I see what you mean by the locality now. Alas, I can't assess whether it's the right thing to do regarding NUMA behavior that you try to optimize (i.e. you need an answer from someone more familiar with NUMA balancing). Michal